THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 55, March 19, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT EQUALS SUSTAINED POVERTY:
KEEPING DEVELOPIUNG COUNTRIES CUTE, INDIGENOUS,
ELECTRICITY-POOR, IMPOVERISHED, & DISEASE-RIDDEN
By Paul K. Driessen
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: AN ISSUE THAT HAS COME TO DOMINATE DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL
PRACTICES & CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY -- THE TRUTH ABOUT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THAT POLITICAL
ENVIRONMENTALISTS DO ALL THEY CAN TO SUGAR-COAT & SUPPRESS: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STOPS ENERGY &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN IMPOVERISHED COUNTRIES & SUSTAINS POVERTY, MISERY, DISEASE, & PREMATURE DEATH
FULL STORY:
Critics are “lying about environmentalists” and “willfully misrepresenting facts” about them and their views, concerns and agendas.
So says a recent commentary by the Earth Island Institute and Environmental News Network
.
A principle object of their wrath was a recent article by this author, shredding lofty claims about wind turbines, much as these
towering “Cuisinarts of the air” eviscerate birds and bats. They particularly objected to this statement:
"The Earth Island Institute longs for the day when Africa’s poor made clothing
for their neighbors 'on foot-pedal-powered sewing machines' and says, 'once they
get electricity, they spend too much time watching television and listening to the
radio.'”
“Earth Island longs for no such thing,” the ENN column protested, “and Driessen is misrepresenting “a former Earth Island
staff member who spoke supporting sustainable development in Africa.”
One can readily understand their pique at being roundly criticized for their eco-imperialistic, anti-development ideologies. However,
the facts speak for themselves. Former Earth Island Institute spokesman Gar Smith’s comments were duly reported in a 2002
CNSNews.com story, commentary in which Smith opined:
"I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing…. I have seen villages in Africa
that had vibrant culture and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed
by the introduction of electricity."
Once they got electricity, "African villagers spent too much time watching television and listening to the radio, allowing their
traditional ways to fade away", according to Smith.
Smith lamented that "people who used to spend their days and evenings in the streets playing music on their own instruments, and
sewing clothing for their neighbors on foot-peddle-powered sewing machines," lost their culture with the advent of electricity. "If
there is going to be electricity, I would like it to be decentralized, small, solar-powered," he said.
Moreover, in the common vernacular of radical environmentalism and “corporate social responsibility,” helping African villages to
retain their “traditional ways” – by keeping their access to electricity at a bare minimum – is precisely what is meant by “sustainable
development.” Thus, actor Ed Begley, Jr., pontificates that “it’s much cheaper for everybody in Africa to have electricity where they
need it, in their huts.” (And huts forever, one might suppose, since little solar panels like these can barely power a few light bulbs
and small appliances – and certainly can never provide enough electricity for a modern hospital, school, office, manufacturing facility
or society.)
Similarly, the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) demands that the World Bank, Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and
other lenders demonstrate their social responsibility by pulling the plug on coal and natural gas power projects, and funding only
renewable energy. But not the most efficient and cost-effective of all renewable sources, of course – the hydroelectric facilities that
generate 99% of all electricity that currently comes from renewables. Wind and solar are the only “appropriate” and “sustainable”
sources permitted under radical Green and CSR standards. And the smaller-scale the better, when it comes to poor developing
countries.
Begley, RAN, Earth Island, Friends of the Earth, International Rivers Network, and similar groups are adamantly opposed to
“damming more rivers” to provide clean water and abundant, affordable, reliable electricity to the world’s poor. Hydro projects “ruin
good kayaking rivers” and “displace” little creatures that live along river banks. On the other hand, most of these environmental
activists voice few objections to the impact that forests of 300-foot-tall wind turbines have on scenic values or bird and bat
populations.
Environmentalists airbrush and sanitize “sustainable development,” dressing it up in fancy verbal raiment about pristine nature,
indigenous cultures, and future generations. But the result remains unchanged. "Sustainable development" is being used to justify
blocking energy and economic development, and keeping the world’s most destitute people mired in misery.
“Cute, indigenous customs aren’t so charming when they make up one’s day-to-day existence,” Kenya’s Akinyi Arunga observes.
“Then they mean indigenous poverty, indigenous malnutrition, indigenous disease
and childhood death. I don’t wish this on my worst enemy, and I wish our socalled
friends would stop imposing it on us.”
Opposition to hydroelectric projects is “a crime against humanity,” a man in Gujarat, India, angrily told a United Kiingdom television
news crew. “We don’t want to be encased like a museum,” a Gujarati woman told the crew, in “traditional” lifestyles so romanticized
by Hollywood and radical Greens."
South African anti-poverty activist Leon Louw says bluntly:
“Telling destitute people in my country, and in countries with even greater
destitution, that they must never aspire to living standards much better than
they have now – because it wouldn’t be ‘sustainable’ – is just one example
of the hypocrisy we have had thrust in our faces, in an era when we can and
should grow fast enough to become fully developed in a single generation.
We’re fed up with it.”
One factor driving opposition to Third World development is the global warming alarmists’ fixation on theoretical human-caused climate change.
They know that, despite the economic pain it will inflict on signatory nations, the Kyoto Protocol will at best keep global
temperatures from rising a few tenths of a degree over the next century. That’s why global warming alarmists now say global
emissions must be cut by 60 to 80 percent!
But developing countries are exempted from the Kyoto treaty’s draconian measures, and China, India and Brazil refused to be bound
– and are strong enough that they can’t be bullied. So the alarmists have turned their attention to the smaller nations, successfully
pressuring banks and governments not to support power generation projects. The tactic supposedly keeps emissions down, if one
ignores the millions of wood, grass, and dung fires that substitute for electricity. It certainly keeps poor people from become middle
class consumers of “finite resources.”
It also gets the banks and other organizations out of the environmental pressure groups’ crosshairs, at least for awhile. But it does so
by imposing a death sentence on critically needed projects – and millions of people, who succumb to a host of diseases that no longer
exist in developed countries.
Why any ethical company or politician would want to be associated with such policies is a mystery. Poor countries need sustained
development, not sustainable development, if they are ever to take what Rabbi Daniel Lapin calls “their rightful place among the
Earth’s prosperous people.”
Opposition to centralized electricity and economic projects, support for “sustainable development” and “appropriate” forms of
small-scale renewable energy projects, and an attachment to romanticized visions of “indigenous” cultures, are merely different facets
of the anti-human attitudes that dominate so much of environmentalist thought today. They are ingredients in a recipe for sustained
poverty, misery, disease, and premature death.
They need to be resisted – not applauded or promoted – by every ethical and socially responsible CEO, politician, journalist,
clergyman, and citizen. For its part, the environmentalist movement needs to do some serious soul-searching, and began to abide by
the same rules of honesty, transparency, morality, accountability – and concern for people’s lives – that it demands of everyone else.
© 2005 Paul K. Driessen
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, which can be
obtained at www.Eco-Imperialism.com. Email: pdriessen@cox.net --- Telephone:
(703) 698-6171
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues