THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 96, April 27, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE UNITED NATIONS AT AGE SIXTY:  WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT
By Daniel Mandel

REASONS FOR THE UNITED NATIONS' COLOSSAL FAILURE AS A COUNCIL OF NATIONS ESTABLISHED TO PREVENT THE WORST EXCESSES OF INTERNATIONAL CONDUCT -- WHY BLAMING THE COLD WAR FOR STUNTING THE WORLD BODY ONLY CONFUSES SYMPTOM WITH CAUSE
FULL STORY:   On April 26, 1945, diplomats convened in San Francisco, California, to establish the United Nations. Sixty years later, it has never looked a bigger failure. Its founders would be amazed at the Frankenstein creation that now sits on Manhattan's East River.

The horrors of World War II had led statesmen from countries great and small to devise a council of nations to prevent the worst excesses of international conduct. An admirable ideal, but it has not worked out that way.

Many blame the Cold War for stunting the world body, but that confuses symptom with cause. With the anniversary and the raging debate about John Bolton's fitness to be U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, here are some reasons for the UN's delinquency:

THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS NOT A DEMOCRATIC BODY.
Members of the General Assembly represent not people, but governments, many squalid dictatorships. In U.S. terms, imagine a presidential ballot with every state represented by an equal number of electoral votes, and the voting in many states determined by cliques of gangsters, not the people, and the fraud on constitutional democracy is obvious.
THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL IS SUBECT TO THE VETO POWER FIVE VERY DIFFERENT PERMANENT MEMBERS.
Undoubtedly, this prevents the UN from doing much that's wicked, but also most that's decent. The rare occasions on which the UN came to anyone's rescue -- South Korea in 1950 and Kuwait in 1991 -- were made possible by a Soviet boycott (never repeated) in one case and a rare abstention by China in the other.
BLOCKS OF NATIONS CONNIVE TO RENDER THE UNITED NATIONS IMPOTENT.
For example, no discussions are held, resolutions passed, or action taken on China's obliteration of life and culture in Tibet.

For another, France, Russia, and China were able, for self-interested reasons, to prevent the Security Council from enforcing its own resolutions on Iraq, leading the U.S.A. and its allies to do so on their own.

A third example: the 56-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference effectively vetoes any definition of terrorism that does not exempt the Palestinians.

LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY & HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEES IS NO BARRIER TO UN MEMBERSHIP & PARTICILATION.
Thus, the UN's Human Rights Commission has lately included six of the world's most politically repressive regimes (Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Libya, China, Vietnam), one of which (Libya) recently presided over the Commission. The committee overseeing women's rights was recently headed by Iran, a country known for socalled "honor-killings" of wives and daughters. And while Saddam Hussein ruled in Baghdad, the Committee on Disarmament was presided over by Iraq.

And fatal structural flaws have rendered the UN ineffective and corrupt. Thus, the oil-for-food scandal, whereby providing humanitarian aid for Iraq degenerated into a network of graft that enriched Saddam Hussein and a host of middlemen, including UN officials. In the tsunami disaster, it was the U.S. and Australian navies that swiftly deployed forces to assist the millions of survivors. The best the UN could dispatch in that time were a group of concerned bureaucrats.

U.N. peace-keeping operations have also been conspicuously ineffective. Thus, the disarming of Muslims in Srebrenica, leading to their slaughter and expulsion, while their authorized protectors stood by. Or the enforced passivity of UN forces at the vital moment in Rwanda, permitting the massacre of up to 800,000 Hutus, for which failure responsibility lies credibly at the door of the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

A satirist could scarcely conceive so perverse a record. Embroiled in multiple crises (UN personnel raping women and minors in African countries is another), Annan has made a beeline for the drawing board and returned with a package of proposed reforms -- a new panel to critically assess UN performance, new procedures for staff misdemeanors, etc. Less-well publicized is the fact that these ideas and others are a rehash of measures already proposed and supposedly implemented by Annan years ago.

In short, there is little to celebrate sixty years on, and even less reason to expect positive change. The U.S.A., which provides a quarter of the UN budget, should consider new ways to spend taxpayer money, holding the UN to performance standards before disbursing funds, backing a new caucus of constitutional democratic nations and reallocating funds to external initiatives that do some good, to name a few.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The United Nations & Its Agencies



Daniel Mandel is Associate Director of the Middle East Forum in Philadelphia and author of H.V. Evatt and the Establishment of Israel: The Undercover Zionist (London: Routledge, 2004).


The foregoing article by Daniel Mandel was originally published in the Philadelphia Daily News, April 26, 2005, and can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.


Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
April 26, 2005





Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues