THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 155, July 20, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

CAN THE UNITED NATIONS REALLY BE REFORMED?
By Dr. Ron Paul

WHY THE UNITED NATIONS CANNOT BE REFORMED:  THE UN AS A CORRUPT, INEFFECTIVE, & ILLEGITIMATE SUPRA-NATIONAL GOVERNMENT -- THE NEED FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO REJECT THE ULTRA-INTERNATIONALISM OF THE GLOBALISTS & RETURN TO REAL NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & TO ALLIANCES THAT ARE IN ACCORD WITH AMERICAN NATIONAL INTERESTS & THAT ENDANGER NEITHER AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE NOR OUR CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICAN INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT -- THE NEED FOR THE U.S.A. TO DISCARD ITS INTERNATIONALIST, PRO-UN FOREIGN POLICY & TO ADOPT & PURSUE A TRULY NATIONALIST, PRO-AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY
FULL STORY:   In early June, 2005, the United States Congress, under the guise of United Nations "reform," voted to give that international body unprecedented new authority to intervene in the affairs of individual sovereign states. The socalled "reform bill" theoretically provides for Congress to withhold 50% of U.S. dues to the United Nations, but this will never happen. The bill allows the U.S. Secretary of State to make the ultimate decision about payment of the dues, and the Liberal internationalist bureaucrats in the U.S. Department of State strongly oppose withholding our dues to the UN. In fact, the State Department is the UN’s closest ally in the entire U.S. government. This talk about withholding our dues is nothing but hot air designed to dupe real Conservatives outside Washington, D.C., into believing Congress is getting tough with the United Nations. Nothing could be further from the truth. Both the congressional leadership and the Bush administration are firmly committed to globalism, as evidenced not only by their commitment to the UN, but also by their position on trade agreements like CAFTA. Mark my words, in five years, nobody will be talking about UN reform and our dues payments will be higher than ever.

The supposed reform bill will not change the bureaucratic nature of the UN, nor will it transform the nation-states of the world into wise, benevolent, selfless actors. It will, however, expand the UN’s role as world policeman and establish the precursor to a UN army. If you don’t think that units of the U.S. Armed Forces should serve under a UN command, you should be aware that the reform bill establishes a “Peacekeeping Commission” charged with bolstering the UN’s ability to respond with military force to conflicts around the globe – even in wholly internal conflicts that do not affect the U.S.A. and its allies in the slightest.

Many American Conservatives have bought into the Neoconservative dream of using the United Nations as a tool to advance an aggressive US foreign policy. But granting more power to the UN can only serve the interests and ideology of globalists, who see national sovereignty as an obstacle to their goals. The more we involve ourselves with the UN, the more we entangle ourselves in the affairs of other nations, to our own detriment. America has nothing to show for our sixty years in the UN, except for tens of thousands of dead or injured soldiers, and hundreds of billions of wasted American tax dollars. The 20th century – the UN century – was the bloodiest in the world’s history. We must stop fooling ourselves that the UN is an instrument of world peace.

The problem is not that the UN is corrupt, or ineffective, or run by scoundrels. The real problem is that the UN is inherently illegitimate, illegitimate because supra-national government is an inherently illegitimate concept. Legitimate governments operate only by the consent of those they govern. And it is ludicrous to suggest that billions of people across the globe have in any way consented to UN governance, or have even the slightest influence over their own governments. Although the UN is perhaps the least democratic institution imaginable, both Democrats and Republicans in the U.S.A. insist on using the UN to “promote democracy.” We should stop worrying about the UN and simply walk away from it by withdrawing our membership and our money.

We should reject the ultra-internationalism of the globalists. We should demand a return to real national sovereignty and to alliances that are in accord with American national interests and that threaten neither American independence nor our constitutional democratic republican institutions of government. We should coalesce with and assist, but respect the sovereignty of, foreign nations that are genuinely peaceful and are true friends of the U.S.A.

By abandoning our failed internationalist, pro-UN foreign policy and by adopting and pursuing a nationalist foreign policy, one that is based the national interests of the U.S.A. and those of America's true allies, we would make the world a more peaceful place.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The United Nations & Its Agencies



Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, elected from and representing the Fourteenth Congressional District of Texas. Congressman Paul is considered to be one of America's leading spokesmen for constitutional government, the rule of law, liberty under law, the private enterprise system,, free market economics, sound monetary policy, and fiscal restraint on the part of the U.S. national government.




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues