THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 170, August 8, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE 2008 ELECTIONS:  NEWT GINGRICH VERSUS HILLARY CLINTON?
By Alan Caruba

AN EARLY, BUT TIMELY, START AT SPECULATING ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2008: A LOOK AT A POSSIBLE RACE BETWEEN CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN NEWTON LEROY GINGRICH & LIBERAL LEFTIST DEMOCRAT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON -- SPECULATION REGARDING THE SUCCESS OR FAILURE OF A NEWT GINGRICH PRESIDENCY:  WHY, HISTORICALLY, OVER-EDUCATED INTELLECTUALS FREQUENTLY HAVE NOT BEEN THE BEST PRESIDENTS
FULL STORY:   There’s a really good profile of Newton Leroy Gingrich, the former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, in the August, 2005, issue of GQ magazine, a profile written by Robert Draper. Mind you, I do not usually read GQ, because men’s fashions have never been of much interest to me. However, Lauren Starke, the magazine’s publicist, knew I would want to read the Gingrich profile.

In May, 2005, I had written a commentary titled: “Is Newt Gingrich Too Smart to be President?” My commentary was, essentially, a review of Gingrich's new book, Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America. I liked the book, but noted: “It’s the kind of book that policy wonks and political junkies like to read.”

Draper’s profile is a hoot. He understands the megalomania that drives men like Newt who want to be President. One is reminded of Richard M. Nixon after his defeat when he ran for Governor of California, telling reporters they wouldn’t have Nixon “to kick around anymore.” And then he proceeded to devote himself fulltime to becoming President. And then the same megalomania, combined with a huge dose of paranoia, permitted the travesty of Watergate to occur. Nixon was a very smart fellow, but too smart perhaps to be President.

Others with sizeable IQ’s have held the job. Teddy Roosevelt was a huge intellect, but, before reaching the Presidency, he had been a rancher, a police commissioner, a soldier, and then a politician. He understood the common man, despite TR's patrician upbringing. I sometimes miss the days of the backrooms in which political bosses selected the nominees for high office. Those power brokers managed to find remarkable men like Teddy Roosevelt and Harry Truman.

They also managed to find Woodrow Wilson, formerly President of Princeton University and then Governor of New Jersey. Woodrow was a first class intellectual and a second-rate bigot, a first class utopian ideologue and the dupe of European politicos who ran circles around him after World War I. Back home, the Senate rejected U.S. membership in his beloved League of Nations. They were right then. They should have rejected FDR’s legacy, the United Nations.

My point is that intellectuals often do not make the best presidents. Men who have gotten their hands dirty doing real work often fare better, though it must be said that mostly lawyers have held the job, handing it off to former generals, every so often. The worst profession for the Presidency is engineer. Herbert Hoover was an excellent engineer, whose tin ear for the economy left us deep in the Great Depression. Jimmy Carter, an Annapolis engineering graduate, was so mired in the minutia of the office, the voters could not wait to throw him out.

One senses that Newt doesn’t think George W. Bush is an intellectual and few others would accuse the President of thinking deep thoughts either. History, however, confers greatness on war presidents and is likely to be kind to Bush43 in this respect. Now into his second term, his power to influence any kind of legislation is fading rapidly.

So, naturally, Newt is thinking about the 2008 elections. His candidate for the Democratic Party nominee is U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton. As Draper writes in the GQ profile:

    “The Clintons are never far from Newt’s mind. They’re like the Kennedy’s were to Nixon: glamorous, charismatic, brazen power-grabbing elitists (and) amoral lying dream killers. Wrong on health care, wrong on the budget, wrong on the military…and so clever!”

Of Hillary, Newt says:

    “You have to respect her. This is a first-class professional.”

Scary, huh?

Newt’s candidate for the Republican Party presidential nomination is Newt Gingrich. Newt will be spending so much time in Iowa and New Hampshire between now and the primaries that you will think he owns homes in these and other key states. And, until the time is right, he will deny he has ambitions to head the Republican ticket.

He has one advantage. Newt is not McCain, Frist, Pataki, or Guiliani. Perhaps a dark horse will emerge from Republican ranks to capture the public’s attention and support, but, at this writing, none of these candidates look strong enough to defeat Hillary. Newt says, “Anybody on our side who thinks you can beat Hillary just by being shallow and belligerent, they just gonna get their lunch eaten.”

Newt, however, has some disadvantages. As Draper points out, Newt “dumped his longtime ‘best friend and closet adviser,’ Marianne (for whom he dumped Jackie, the mother of his two daughters), after a lengthy affair with House Agriculture Committee staffer Callista Bisek, a high-cheekboned blond twenty-three years Newt’s junior.” Not exactly the exemplar of traditional marriage.

Newt’s claim to fame is that, back in 1994, when everyone told him it could not happen, he co-authored the famed “Contract with America,” which gave control of Congress to the Republicans. He was instrumental in pushing through legislation that has been good for the nation, but ten years later, the Republican Revolution is deader than roadkill. His political skills deserted him as Speaker of the House. Bill Clinton just charmed the pants off of him. This is not a good thing in a man who wants to be the leader of the free world, dealing with some of the most evil men on the face of the Earth.

So Newt arrives on the scene today with some serious baggage and an attitude that Draper describes as “Either go with my Big Idea or…fail!” Methinks it will be Newt who will fail, whether or not he secures the GOP nomination. Like I said, he’s too smart to be President.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
American Politics & Political Competition

American Government & the U.S. Presidency



Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at www.anxietycenter.com.


© Alan Caruba 2005


Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com





Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues