THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 265, December 9, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
HISTORY'S DANGEROUS INTERSECTIONS
By Alan Caruba
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN TODAY'S WORLD: THE GREATEST MILITARY POWER IN THE WORLD, THE MOST
POWERFUL ECONOMY IN THE WORLD, THE DRIVER OF INVENTION & INNOVATION, & THE EXPORTER OF THE AMERICAN
NATIONAL HERITAGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY & INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY UNDER LAW -- SHAPING UNITED STATES
FOREIGN & MILITARY POLICY TO COPE EFFECTIVELY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS & THREATS THAT HAVE
EMERGED SINCE THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET EMPIRE & THE END OF THE COLD WAR
FULL STORY:
History is a lot like a dangerous intersection where everyone knows that, sooner or later, an accident is going to kill a whole bunch
of people, but do nothing until it happens. Then — and only then — do the town fathers find the money for a stoplight and warning
signs.
Looking back, people recall that, “Yes, that intersection was an accident just waiting to happen,” wondering why blood had to be
spilled to take action. In the late 1930s and early 1940s, a war was already raging in Europe and Asia when on December 7, 1941, there
was a Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, our Hawaiian naval base. Overnight, America went from an isolationist policy to one of
retaliation and intervention, declaring war, not just on Japan, but on Germany as well.
The nation emerged from World War II as the precursor to what we are today, the greatest military power in the world, the most
powerful economy in the world, the driver of invention and innovation, and the exporter of our national heritage -- the freedoms we
believe everyone on the face of the earth should share.
We believe so firmly in this that America has expended billions, first to contain the threat of Soviet-style Communism, and, since
September 11, 2001, to destroy the threat of a global Islamic jihad. We have shed the blood of our Armed Forces to advance freedom.
In the modern era, we have not retained control over any land we won in battle.
Instead, we helped rebuild Germany, Japan and South Korea, all now thriving constitutional democracies and free market economies.
Today, however, there are voices telling us we cannot do the same thing for Iraq or Afghanistan. We must, these voices insist, quit
the Middle East and abandon it to the despots who have made it the birthing room of global terrorism.
Just as the men who inherited the world after World War II fashioned an answer to the enemies of freedom, a new world demands
new answers for its future. One man, Thomas P.M. Barnett, proposes to provide those answers in his new book, Blueprint for
Action ($26.95, G.P. Putnam’s Sons). In 2004, Barnett burst onto the national scene with his bestseller, The Pentagon’s New
Map. He had been a Senior Strategic Researcher at the Naval War College, where, as an analyst and futurist, it was Barnett’s job
to game the “what if” scenarios if the nation had to go to war anywhere in the world.
A specialist in Soviet affairs, when that empire fell apart in the 1990s, Barnett set himself the task of figuring out what the new world
looked like and why some parts worked and some did not. Barnett’s long years of interfacing with the nation’s military gave him deep
insights into the way they prepared for the future, but he began to see it as a divide between the “Core,” industrialized nations, both
“old” and “new”, and the “Gap” nations -- like those in the Middle East, Africa, and some parts of South Asia -- which were
“unconnected” to a world with “rule-sets,” such as working constitutions, legal and educational systems, and participation in trade
agreements that facilitated entrepreneurship and good, safe conditions for both multinational and local corporations.
In The Pentagon’s New Map, he shared with readers the message he had been teaching the leaders of today’s and tomorrow’s
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. He taught them to look at the new world in new ways. He looked at our “Leviathan” military
strength and told them that, yes, the United States can now swiftly disable any army that goes against us, but the fact is we have
essentially been fighting individuals! Manuel Noriega in Panama, Farrah Aidid in Somalia, Slobodan Milosevic in the Balkans, and,
more recently, Saddam Hussein in Iraq. And, in Afghanistan and Pakistan, we are still looking for Osama bin Laden.
And, then, he told those military men and women, yes, we can conquer any enemy we confront, but we cannot do it alone! As we
have learned in the last two conflicts, we need what Barnett calls “systems administrators”, i.e., those people, some military, some
civilian, who can come in swiftly after the smoke clears to put the conquered nation back on its feet. We can win any war, but we
must now begin to think in terms of winning the peace that must follow or the military effort will be deemed a defeat in the long run.
For that, we need a world of allies! In Iraq, there are more than 60 other nations participating in nation-building tasks.
Barnett sees new allies on the horizon, forecasting not a war with China, but tapping its systems administration capabilities to put
“Gap” nations whose despots have been removed on the path to “connectivity” with the Core nations. China, as its need for access
to the global marketplace grows, along with its need for energy sources, will continue its transformation, says Barnett. He sees a new
generation of young Chinese educated in America’s universities and holding the bright promise of a new era.
India, too, is seen in this respect, as is Russia. These are the “seam” nations, the “New Core” whose interests in this new era of
connectivity increasingly converge with our own. Europe, too, must adapt to improved levels of international cooperation. For
example, Germany, one of the European nations that opposed our invasion of Iraq, has a large systems administration and military
contingent in Afghanistan, insuring that constitutional democracy gets a chance to flourish there. Japan and other “Core” nations
are participating in the reconstruction of Iraq.
Finally, there are the “Gap” nations, nations comprising virtually the entire continent of Africa and, of course, much of the Middle
East, and parts of the Asian-Pacific area. These are nations largely dependent on the export of natural resources, keeping them
trapped in underdevelopment, and often run by thugs such as Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe or Kim Sung Ill of North Korea. Barnett
proposes a variety of ways to “shrink” the “Gap” until these nations begin to create a decent living environment for their people,
comparable in freedom and development to the rest of the world.
“America does not lead globalization because it’s exceptional,” says Barnett. “America leads simply because it got there first.” Our
leadership position in the world is not based “simply on [our] success as a nation-state, but as the world’s first and most successful
multinational political and economic union.” In other words, we know how to “play nice” in a world filled with nations led by thugs
who do not want to play by any rules.
Virtually every page of Blueprint for Action contains some startling insight that brings with it an “ah-hah” moment. I
recommend you read it with a highlighter pen, because you will want to go back to it. Will the future turn out as Barnett forecasts?
For the sake of the world, we better hope so.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a
clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted
on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at
www.anxietycenter.com.
© Alan Caruba 2005
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues