THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 277, December 16, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
UTOPIAN SOLUTIONS VERSUS REAL CORPORATE
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
By Father Philip W. De Vous
LIBERATION THEOLOGY & POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM VERSUS PRIVATE ENTERPRISE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
THE PROPAGANDA WAR BEING WAGED AGAINST THE DOE RUN COMPANY BY PRO-MARXIST LIBERATION
THEOLOGIANS WHO EXPOUSE THE POLITICAL AGENDA OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS IN ORDER TO SCORE
IDEOLOGICAL POINTS & ENHANCE THEIR CHANCES OF GAINING POLITICAL & ECONOMIC POWER
FULL STORY:
Every morally responsible company must reflect carefully on how its core business impacts the communities where it
operates, and how it can ensure practices that are ethically and economically sound. This means understanding, assessing,
and acting upon employee well-being, legal and political realities, environmental impacts, cultural considerations, and
religious and moral imperatives. One company making just such a serious effort is The Doe Run Company of St. Louis,
Missouri, and its subsidiary, Doe Run Peru.
For months, the company has endured criticism from certain journalists and certain sectors of the Catholic Church and other
Christian denominations. So, earlier this year, Doe Run asked me to help the company better understand the moral,
philosophical, and theological principles and traditions that should guide socially responsible corporations.
I spent an extremely busy week in Lima and the Andes Mountain town of La Oroya, touring company facilities, visiting
homes and neighboring villages, meeting workers and local people, and sharing my views on Christian teaching. These
discussions focused particularly on the nature and dignity of work and labor, the rights and responsibilities of corporations,
Christian moral precepts about environmental issues, issues related to faith and social justice, and the numerous projects
the company has carried out to improve life in these communities.
Doe Run gave me full access to all areas of its facilities, and enabled me to see where people lived, went to school, and
participated in life at its lead and silver smelting operation and in the community. I was encouraged to ask questions of any
employees, community leaders, and local people we encountered, to learn about environmental progress, nutrition, safety,
and sanitation programs, health clinics, educational initiatives, vocational training programs, road improvements,
agricultural projects, and numerous modernized buildings and facilities.
Throughout this process, Doe Run was open and straightforward about the issues, liabilities, and problems it faced in
meeting business demands, addressing concerns, and assisting people involved in or affected by its operations. It became
clear to me that the community – young and old alike – know the Doe Run people on sight, truly like them, feel free to
discuss issues and ideas with them, take pride in their city and the strides it is making, and both appreciate and assist with
the company's extensive projects.
Having seen all this firsthand, I could not help but wonder which city and company the critics are talking about when they
level their complaints. What I heard and saw was completely different from what I had read in various news stories or was
told during two meetings with some of those critics.
Without question, Doe Run Peru is operating on the basis of sound principles of economic and environmental development.
Its many social projects amply illustrate the attention it devotes to problems associated with the pervasive poverty that has
long plagued this region.
In my view, the deep and personal involvement of Doe Run in the life of the community, and the high level of support it
enjoys there, is evidence of the company’s respect for the dignity of its workers and other stakeholders. It is also a living
expression of Doe Run's conscious effort to be faithful to one of the core principles of Christian social teaching –
subsidiarity: the idea that economic, political, and social problems are best understood and solved by the organizations and
people closest to and most affected by them.
Doe Run has taken up the challenge of evaluating its operations and practices, using the same moral, theological, and
religious traditions its detractors use when criticizing the company. What is little known outside the theological world,
however, is that many of these critics are deeply imbued with and guided by "liberation theology." Despite its many
nuances, this philosophy is really nothing more that Marxism painted over with a thin veneer of Christian moralizing about
class struggle, the supposed illegitimacy of private enterprise, and ultimately the asserted need to radically redistribute
limited wealth. In the latest twist, liberation theologians now espouse a "green agenda," which seeks to use environmental
concerns to score more ideological points.
However, the policy agenda that these critics pursue, using frequent invocations of the Gospel, would actually have the
opposite effects of what they desire: environmental improvements, better health for workers, cleaner communities, and
higher levels of prosperity. No matter how often or carefully it is moralized, the real goal of liberation theology and critics of
globalization and economic development is political and economic power. This has been amply illustrated throughout the
recent history of Latin America in El Salvador, Argentina, Venezuela, and Peru.
Equally to the point, in all my experience with non-governmental organizations across the world, I have yet to see any of
them do anything as effectively or extensively as Doe Run. They certainly have not done much to help the people in or
around La Oroya.
The criticisms leveled against The Doe Run Company simply cannot be sustained, when they are held up against the
company's very socially responsible track record. While there certainly are imperfections and delays in making some
important and necessary things happen, these are due to the realities imposed by markets, finances, politics, manpower
and circumstances.
Simply put, the world's imperfections impose constraints. Christian social teaching recognizes this and does not offer
utopian solutions – but, rather, guidance on how to operate responsibly in the face of complex challenges. The Doe Run
Company has been as forthcoming, transparent, effective, and accountable as anyone can be in its efforts to be a socially
responsible company.
Other companies and organizations should be so conscientious.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Science, Ethics, & Human Health
Father. Phillip W. De Vous is the Chaplain of Thomas More College in Crestview Hills, Kentucky, and an adjunct scholar of
public policy at the Acton Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Father Phillip De Vous was invited by The Doe Run Company to tour its facilities in the mountain town of La Oroya, Peru,
back in August. He was asked to offer his frank assessment about how well the company is meeting its legal and other
obligations, and share his views on Christian teachings and the moral, philosophical, and theological principles that should
guide socially responsible corporations.
His visit to La Oroya was part of Doe Run’s commitment to seek ongoing input regarding its operations and efforts to improve
the area’s health, communities, and physical environment. In the past, the company has also consulted with Greenpeace
Co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore, health risk expert Dr. Teresa Bowers, and numerous local officials in the La Oroya area. Father
DeVous’ conclusions stand in stark contrast to criticisms by Oxfam, certain Catholic and Presbyterian officials, and various
journalists (who claim to represent morality, social responsibility and concern for the environment).
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues