THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VIII, Issue # 38, February 19, 2006
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
AN IDEOLOGUE'S HISTORY OF MODERN PALESTINE:
A BOOK REVIEW
By Efraim Karsh
A DISTORTED & INACCURATE HISTORY OF THE ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT, WRITTEN BY A DIEHARD IDEOLOGUE WHO
VIEWS ZIONIST & ISRAELI HISTORY AS MORE THAN A CENTURY OF COLONIZATION, OCCUPATION, & DISPOSSESSION OF
PALESTINIAN ARABS: A MANIFESTION OF THE CRISIS IN MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES -- BLURRING THE DIVIDING LINE
BETWEEN ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP & UNADULTERATED PROPAGANDA
FULL STORY:
Ilan Pappé is the odd man out among the socalled New Historians. Unlike his colleagues, who pretend to base their anti-Israel
writings on recently declassified documents from the British Mandate period and the first years of Israeli independence, Pappé
is an unabashed "relativist" for whom historical research is a backward-looking projection of political attitudes and agendas,
regardless of actual facts. Aside from his doctoral dissertation, subsequently published as Britain and the Arab-Israeli
Conflict, 1948-51, [1] Pappé's books are not based on archival documentation, preferring secondary (and deeply prejudiced)
sources that aim at vindicating the Palestinian "narrative" of the conflict. He himself explains this in the introduction to A
History of Modern Palestine -- One Land, Two Peoples:
"My bias is apparent, despite the desire of my peers that I stick
to facts and the 'truth' when reconstructing past realities. I view
any such construction as vain and presumptuous. This book is
written by one who admits compassion for the colonized, not the
colonizer; who sympathizes with the occupied, not the occupiers."
This unabashed acknowledgment of personal bias and open political partisanship comes from a diehard ideologue who views
Zionist and Israeli history as "more than a century of colonization, occupation, and dispossession of Palestinians." The
equation of Zionism with colonialism, the cornerstone of Pappé's historical narrative, has been a staple of Arab propaganda
since the early 1920s. Almost as predictable is the portrayal of Arabs and Palestinians as the hapless victims of this alleged
foreign invasion.
Publication of A History of Modern Palestine -- One Land, Two Peoples [2] by a prestigious academic press is a
sad testament to the pervasive politicization of Middle Eastern studies, where the dividing line between academic scholarship
and unadulterated propaganda has been blurred, if not erased.
Even by the skewed standards of this field of studies, Pappé's latest book ranks in a class of its own. Not only does it add no
new facts or ideas to the anti-Israel literature, but the sloppiness of its research astounds. It contains countless factual errors
and inaccuracies. Yasir Arafat's birthplace is Cairo and not Jerusalem. The U.N. Special Commission on Palestine (UNSCOP)
presented its report on August 31, 1947, not on November 29. Deir Yasin is a village near Jerusalem, and not in Haifa. Lawrence
of Arabia had nothing to do with the Anglo-Hashemite correspondence that led to the "Great Arab Revolt" of World War I.
Further, this correspondence was initiated by the Hashemites, not by the British. Pappé even misspells the official English
transliteration of President Weizmann's first name (Chaim, not Haim).
More serious is the book's consistent resort to factual misrepresentation, distortion, and outright falsehood. Readers are told
of events that never happened, such as the nonexistent May, 1948, Tantura "massacre" or the expulsion of Arabs within twelve
days of the partition resolution. Readers learn of political decisions that were never made, such as the Anglo-French 1912 plan
for the occupation of Palestine or the contriving of "a master plan to rid the future Jewish state of as many Palestinians as
possible."
Moreover, readers are misinformed about military and political developments, such as the rationale for the Balfour declaration.
Without Russia, according to Pappé, there was very little hope of successfully surrounding Germany with a ring of enemy
states, a strategy it was hoped would cause Germany to surrender. The British government expected that Russian Jews would
become the agents of pro-British propaganda that would persuade the Tsarist government to come out clearly in support of
the Allies' effort to subjugate Germany.
But Russia was a member of the Triple Entente coalition with Britain and France from the time of the outbreak of hostilities in
1914 and so needed no encouragement to join the war three years later, least of all by its despised and persecuted Jewish
minority. In fact, it was hoped that the Zionist movement, by virtue of its perceived connections to the Bolshevik movement,
would help keep Communist Russia in the war.
Pappé claims that Theodor Herzl "attempted to enlist British help in installing a temporary Jewish state (i.e., one that would
eventually be moved to Palestine) in British Uganda, an offer which was seriously considered by some in Whitehall," only to
have his plan foiled by Weizmann. In fact, it was British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain, not Herzl, who conceived of
the East Africa idea. Nor was the "Uganda plan" foiled by Herzl's opponents, least of all Weizmann. Herzl narrowly got the
plan passed by his last Zionist Congress in 1903, overriding the opposition of such Zionist leaders as Menahem Ussishkin
and Yehiel Chlenov; it was only after Herzl's death in July, 1904, that the idea was unceremoniously buried.
A final example of Pappé's distortion concerns the tidal wave of Arab violence that immediately followed the U.N. partition
vote in November, 1947. On the day after the vote, a spate of Arab attacks left seven Jews dead and scores more wounded.
Shooting, stoning, and rioting continued apace in the following days. The consulates of Poland and Sweden, both of whose
governments had voted for partition, were attacked. Bombs were thrown into cafes, Molotov cocktails were hurled at shops,
a synagogue was set on fire. On December 3, at the instigation of the Palestinian leadership, a large mob ransacked the new
Jewish commercial center in Jerusalem, looting and burning shops and stabbing and stoning whomever they happened upon.
The next day, some 120-150 armed Arabs attacked Kibbutz Efal, on the outskirts of Tel Aviv, in the first large-scale attempt to
storm a Jewish village.
Ignoring this heavily documented historical record, Pappé whitewashes this violence as intra-communal clashes "activated
by hotheaded youth on both sides." He even makes the mind-boggling claim that this violence had been triggered by the
Haganah. Like so much else in A History of Modern Palestine, this is a falsehood.
Does Pappé count on the ignorance of the general reader to accept it? Does he expect his peers to give him a pass? That
Cambridge University Press purveys this disgraceful work suggests that they just might. It also symbolizes the crisis in
Middle East studies.
NOTES:
[1] New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1988.
[2] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The Israeli-Arab Conflict
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
Islamism & Jihadism -- Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Efraim Karsh is Director of the Mediterranean Studies Programme at King's College, University of London, and Editor of the
quarterly journal Israel Affairs. He is the author of Arafat's War -- the Man and His Battle for Israeli Conquest
(Grove Press, 2003).
The foregoing book review by Efraim Karsh was originally published in the Middle East Quarterly, Winter, 2006, and
can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
February 19, 2006
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VIII, 2006
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues