THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VIII, Issue # 104, June 15, 2006
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
WILL WAL-MART'S ORGANIC COTTON SAVE THE PLANET?
By Dennis T. Avery & Alex A. Avery
POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM & THE ORGANIC FOOD & FIBER MOVEMENT: WILL WAL-MART'S SALES OF
ORGANIC COTTON GARMENTS SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT? THE FACTS VERSUS THE PROPAGANDA DISSEMINATED BY
ORGANIC EXCHANGE & OTHER ANTI-PESTICIDE ORGANIZATIONS -- AGRICULTURE, BIOTECHNOLOGY, & THE FAILURE OF
ANTI-PESTICIDE ENVIRONMENTALISTS TO FACTOR HIGH CROP YIELDS INTO THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL TALLY SHEET
FULL STORY:
Will Wal-Mart’s sales of organic cotton garments save the environment?
Wal-Mart recently sold 190,000 yoga outfits made from organic cotton through its Sam’s Club stores. The Organic Exchange
cheered, and announced that Wal-Mart had just saved the planet’s cotton fields from being sprayed with another 500,000
pounds of pesticides. Many cheers.
But wait a minute. If the yoga outfits used about a pound of cotton apiece, and cotton yields average about 750 pounds per
acre, the Organic Exchange was claiming that cotton growers apply a whopping 1,950 pounds of pesticide per acre! In reality,
American cotton growers apply only about 2.3 pounds of pesticides per acre.
The organic yoga outfits actually saved 837 pounds of pesticide — rather than 500,000. But what’s a little 600-fold math error
between friends? Wal-Mart has corrected their web site to claim a saving of 50,000 pounds of pesticide (bringing the math
error down to about 60 fold.)
What’s really awful is that the Organic Exchange failed to take into account the biggest farming factor in saving the
environment: yield per acre from the land we farm. Humanity is already farming about half of the Earth’s land area not covered
with ice or deserts. By 2050, a peak population of about 9 billion humans will live on the planet, and far more of them will be
able to afford an extra cotton shirt or yoga toga. How will we save any land for Nature in a more populous and affluent world?
Only with higher yields. The 2.3 pounds of pesticides applied to an acre of U.S. cotton help save 750 pounds of cotton from
boll weevils and weed competition.
In Africa, where much of the world’s tiny supply of organic cotton is grown, yields are only about 400 pounds. Tanzania gets
only 200 pounds of cotton per acre! The biggest problem isn’t even pests, but the lack of nitrogen to nourish the plant roots.
U.S. farmers take their nitrogen from an inexhaustible source — the air, which is 78 percent nitrogen. For some mysterious
reason, organic farming’s rules forbid the nitrogen fertilizer that encourages higher yields.
Virtually all of the world’s wildlife is in the wildlands were we don’t farm. It’s high time we started measuring our farming by
how much land it leaves for nature, not by how much pesticide or fertilizer is used on the land where the wildlife isn’t.
Of course, we could have it both ways, thanks to biotechnology. High-yield biotech cotton usually has an ultra-safe natural
pesticide bred into its tissues. The only organisms affected by the bred-in pesticide are bugs that try to eat the cotton plant.
It doesn’t affect birds, bees, or humans.
Does the Organic Exchange applaud the safer biotech crops? Nope. The organic movement has loudly banned all biotech
crops from its markets, claiming that “biotech crops don’t yield more.”
Wrong again. China has a new biotech cotton variety that yields 25 percent more fiber per acre than conventional cotton.
Given China’s huge cotton plantings, that will save 3 million acres of farmland for food crops — which will ultimately save
at least that much forest from being cleared and plowed. If the Organic Exchange could brag it had saved 3 million acres of
Asian land for Nature, they’d be up for a Nobel Prize.
Why doesn’t the Organic Exchange factor high crop yields into their environmental tally sheet? Why doesn’t Wal-Mart?
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Dennis T. Avery is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C., and is the Director of the Institute's Center for
Global Food Issues (www.cgfi.org). Formerly he was a senior analyst for the United States
Department of State.
Alex A. Avery is the Director of Research at the Hudson Institute’s Center for Global Food Issues.
Readers may write Dennis and Alex Avery at Post Office Box 202, Churchville, Virginia, 24421. Email: cgfi@rica.net
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VIII, 2006
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues