THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VIII, Issue # 125, July 13, 2006
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
THE MILLIONS OF DEATHS CAUSED BY MALARIA:
A Preventable Tragedy That Must Come to an End
The Full Story
By U.S. Senator Tom Coburn
POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM & THE ANTI-PESTICIDE MOVEMENT VERSUS HUMAN HEALTH IN AFRICA: FIGHTING
THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS & DEFENDING THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT OF EVERY COUNTRY TO DECIDE WHICH
WEAPONS TO USE IN COMBATING MALARIA & OTHER LETHAL DISEASES -- THE NEED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION &
NATION-STATES TO RESIST & REACT VIGOROUSLY AGAINST EFFORTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS TO OBTAIN
INTERNATIONAL TRADE POLICIES PREVENTING IMPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS FROM COUNTRIES THAT USE
DDT FOR PURPOSES OF DISEASE CONTROL & SAVING HUMAN LIVES
NOTE: Physician and U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, MD, has written European Union President José Manuel Barroso, seeking
his “support and help in a life-saving effort.” Many African nations want to use DDT to control malaria and save lives, but
they are being told their agricultural exports could be banned if they do so. This “horrible and unconscionable situation”
must end, Coburn says, and the EU must issue a “clear and unequivocal public statement” supporting the right of countries
to use DDT and all other means to control this killer disease.
Malaria kills another African child every 30 seconds – a million a year. It kills up to 2.7 million people worldwide every year.
Countries afflicted by this disease must be permitted, encouraged, and helped to use every mosquito and malaria control
weapon in our arsenal, Coburn argues. Paul K. Driessen, Senior Policy Advisor, Congress of Racial Equality and Committee
For A Constructive Tomorrow
June 28, 2006
Prime Minister José Manuel Barroso
President in Office
Council of the European Union
Rue de la Loi 16
1000 Brussels, Belgium
Dear Prime Minister Barroso:
I am writing to enlist your support and help in a life-saving effort. As a U.S. Senator and physician, I have become
increasingly concerned about health, social, and economic impacts that malaria continues to have on sub-Saharan
African countries. In fact, since the Roll Back Malaria initiative was launched several years ago, malaria rates have risen
by as much as 10 percent. Today, up to 500 million people contract acute malaria every year, and up to 2 million die –
the vast majority of them in Africa.
It was this largely preventable tragedy that led the United States Congress to engage in aggressive oversight actions to
reform our own failing U.S. anti-malaria efforts, as well as those of multilateral organizations we support, such as the
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the World Health Organization, and others. A year ago, U.S.
President George W. Bush joined the fight in a bold new leadership role, announcing billions of dollars of additional
funding to fight malaria in Africa. Most important, he joined the Congress in insisting that this money be spent on
programs that prioritize proven, life-saving interventions and products over consultants, advice-giving, and meetings.
The President’s Malaria Initiative, along with the Global Fund, is now aggressively funding scaled-up programs of
indoor insecticide-spraying with the insecticide DDT, effective medication treatment, and free distribution of bed nets.
Dr. Arata Kochi, the new chief of the World Health Organization’s global malaria program, is taking bold leadership in
providing encouragement and science-based guidance for using DDT in indoor residual spraying programs.
Experts are finally rallying around the combination that eliminated malaria from the developing world decades ago: DDT
plus effective medication – which currently means Artemisia-based combination therapy (ACT) – in conjunction with
every other weapon in our disease control arsenal: other insecticides and drugs, long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets,
education, sanitation, modern housing, and more clinics with electricity and safe running water. DDT is emphasized for
indoor (but not outdoor) spraying, because just a small amount, sprayed once every six months, keeps 90 percent of
mosquitoes from even entering homes; irritates those that do come in so they don’t bite; and kills any that land on the
walls. No other chemical, at any price, can do that.
As the experiences of South Africa, Swaziland, Mozambique, and Zambia have demonstrated, DDT alone can reduce
malaria disease and death rates by 75 percent in less than two years. The combination of DDT and ACT can slash rates
by 95 percent in three years. That is why a prestigious group including Nobel Peace Laureates Archbishop Desmond
Tutu, Dr. Norman Borlaug and former South Africa President F. W. de Klerk, as well as hundreds of physicians, clergy,
infectious disease experts, human rights advocates and others, have signed the Kill Malarial Mosquitoes Now
declaration, which I have attached for your review. Even Environmental Defense (which launched the anti-DDT
campaign in the 1960s) now says DDT should be used for malaria control.
Naturally, countries suffering the most under the scourge of malaria, such as Uganda, Kenya and other sub-Saharan
nations, want to implement their own DDT-ACT programs. Most of their ministers know that the persistent rumors and
assertions about supposed risks from DDT are mistaken.
Millions of soldiers and civilians were sprayed with DDT during and after World War II, to prevent malaria and typhus,
and, yet, no deaths, no cancers, and no other serious problems were ever documented. DDT is only slightly more toxic to
humans than some vitamins that are absolutely essential to good health; the nicotine found in common cigarettes is 100
times more toxic than DDT; and hundreds of millions of homes have been sprayed with DDT, yet there has not been a
single instance of harm to humans from that spraying.
Regarding wildlife, although fish are sensitive to DDT, none should be exposed to DDT via indoor residual spraying
programs. While we must be good stewards of our environment and the wildlife dependent on that environment, no
amount of protection of fish from an unlikely exposure to DDT justifies excluding weapons from our arsenal that could
save the millions of humans – mostly tiny children and pregnant moms – who die of malaria every year.
Health ministers in African countries have pleaded with their colleagues in the finance and agricultural ministries to
support the use of DDT. But trade and economic officials in some of these countries are naturally concerned about
trade-related consequences – statements by EU officials, both on and off the record, have threatened trade sanctions
against any African country that uses DDT. These officials know that any medical uses of DDT will be fully in accord
with the Stockholm Convention and WHO guidelines. And, yet the threats and rumors persist. This has created great
anxiety among politicians, government ministers, doctors and the general populace, putting them in the untenable
position of having to choose between sustaining jobs and economic growth through agricultural exports on the one
hand, and protecting the lives of their parents and children on the other.
The European Union’s Chargé d’Affaires for Uganda warned that, if Uganda used DDT, the EU would likely ban the
import of its flowers and other agricultural products. An official at pesticide manufacturer Bayer Crop Sciences said he
and the company support the EU position. Several months ago, the EU Trade Representative to Uganda said “nothing
will happen, at least on the official side,” if countries use DDT, but the EU has “no control,” if environmental and
consumer organizations pressure supermarkets to stop selling agricultural products from those nations that use DDT.
My Senate colleagues and I appreciate the fact that some EU officials have denied that these threats represent official
European Union policy. But the impressions and fears persist, and they clearly drive decisions by African and other
countries not to use DDT, even when that means hundreds of thousands of needless deaths, year after year. The
annual death toll from malaria is the equivalent of another Holocaust, this time with African victims, every four or five
years. None of us wants that to continue, or to have their blood on our hands. In African countries, malaria is a much
bigger problem even than AIDS – in many of them, malaria is the number one cause of death and disease among their
population. Yet, if this sort of Western-nation innuendo were stymieing the effective battle against AIDS, I suspect
you would have legions of activists descending upon Brussels. Unfortunately, malaria victims are too young and are
too quickly killed by their disease to storm the gates of the EU.
Thankfully, you, the Council of the European Union, and the EU Parliament are in a position to end this horrible and
unconscionable situation. You could easily put the world's mind at ease by issuing a clear and unequivocal public
statement that –
No boycotts will occur if countries use DDT to save people’s lives;
The EU supports DDT as a vital component of any malaria control
program;
Every country has an absolute right to decide which weapons to
use in combating malaria and other lethal diseases;
The European Union will respond vigorously against trade bans
by EU nations, trade restrictions by importers, and supermarket
campaigns by environmental activists, if such actions are based
on a country’s use of DDT for disease control.
You and I certainly recall that, for centuries, our countries were at the mercy of malaria and the infected mosquitoes that
carried the disease. As Mr. Roy Innis, National Chairman of the civil rights organization, the Congress of Racial Equality,
has observed:
"Malaria once killed thousands of Americans annually, from New
York to California, from Florida and Louisiana to Michigan and
Alaska. Even in the 1930s, it reduced the industrial output of our
southern states by a third.
"In Europe, Oliver Cromwell died from malaria, Charles II and
Louis XIV nearly perished, and Rome was saved several times
from Germanic armies whose ranks were decimated by the
deadly fever. From Italy and Romania to Poland and the
English Channel, malarial mosquitoes ruled over Europe for
centuries. Homegrown malaria was not eradicated in Europe
until 1959."
The United States, Europe, Canada and other developed nations finally eliminated or controlled malaria, and the
widespread use of DDT was a critical element in all those successful efforts. For any of us now to suggest, imply, or
whisper off the record that African countries should not emulate the programs we utilized to control far less serious
malaria epidemics in our countries is simply immoral.
The world – and especially Africa – must know that the United States, Europe, United Nations, World Health
Organization, and other nations and organizations stand united in their support of DDT, ACT drugs, and every other
intervention against malaria. No nation or organization should send further conflicting, and life-threatening, messages to
countries afflicted by malaria, for such messages from important world bodies like the EU will perpetuate the catastrophic
public health disaster that is devastating Africa.
Weak, equivocal, off-the-record suggestions that the European Union does not really intend to impose or enforce trade
sanctions against nations using DDT for public health purposes are simply not enough. The EU Council and Parliament
must go on the record, at the highest levels, to put these trade sanction rumors to rest, and clarify its pro-DDT policies for
any field staff who might be confused or sending conflicting messages to their host countries.
We have it within our power to save millions of lives, and improve health and economic conditions for billions. We simply
must summon the moral clarity and political will to use that power, and spare countless people the ravages of this killer
disease, malaria. I ask you to join me in this effort, and look forward to receiving your response.
Respectfully,
Tom Coburn, M.D., Chairman
Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management,
Government Information, and International Security
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Africa South of the Sahara -- Black Africa
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VIII, 2006
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues