THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IX, Issue # 2, January 2, 2007
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation' Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
AFTER THE DANISH CARTOON CONTROVERSY
By Pernille Ammitzboll & Lorenzo Vidino
THE ENEMY WITHIN: RADICAL ISLAMIC CLERICS OPERATING IN THE WEST -- ISLAMISTS, ISLAMIC POLITICS, & THE
FUROR OVER PUBLICATION OF THE DANISH CARTOONS DEPICTING MUHAMMAD -- THE FUROR AS AN ISLAMIST ASSAULT
ON WESTERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY & THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION -- ISLAMISTS IN A WESTERN
SOCIETY ANALOGOUS TO CANCER CELLS IN A HUMAN BODY -- HIGH TIME FOR WESTERN SOCIETIES TO DISCARD THE
CRIPPLING & SELF-DESTRUCTIVE LIMITATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, & TABOOS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, ESPECIALLY
WHEN DEALING WITH THE THREAT TO INTERNAL SECURITY POSED BY THE ISLAMIST FIFTH COLUMN
FULL STORY:
On February 5, 2005, at the height of the tension following publication in the Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten,
of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, Muslim protesters torched Denmark's embassies in Beirut and Damascus.
While many in the West looked on with bewilderment, protests spread across the Muslim world, and stores in Muslim
areas removed Danish products from their shelves. Even as the cartoon crisis captured headlines around the world, most
people outside Denmark remain unfamiliar with the forces propelling it. Like the Salman Rushdie affair before it and the
furor over Pope Benedict XVI's remarks at Regensburg University after it, the cartoon controversy had less to do with
genuine outrage over the depiction of Islam's prophet and more to do with the ambitions, first, of a small group of radical
imams and, later, of jousting Middle Eastern powers. Now that the dust has settled, what is the legacy of the crisis, not
only for Denmark but also for the Western world?
BACKGROUND
Beginning in the late 1960s, a small Muslim population of Turks, Lebanese, and Somalis began to settle in Gellerup, a
western suburb of Aarhus, Denmark's second largest city. Gellerup, known to most locals as "the ghetto," suffers not
only lower income, poorer education rates, and a higher crime rate than the rest of the city, but also physical isolation.
Its high-rises, which 28,000 Gellerup residents call home, are surrounded by a thick ring of public green and large
boulevards. Designed in 1968 to house blue-collar workers and students from the local university, Gellerup, within two
decades, had become the destination of thousands of foreign immigrants who had moved to Aarhus to work in the city's
food industry. By the mid-1990s, few ethnic Danish residents remained in the development.
As immigrant isolation grew, few Danes, wrapped in the political correctness common across Scandinavia, were willing
to talk publicly about the problems simmering among the population; officials and commentators labeled those who did
as racists and "Islamophobes." By 2001, attitudes began to change. In November, the Center-Right Liberal Party ended
more than seven decades of Left-of-Center Social Democratic rule. In order to cement a coalition, the Liberal leader
Anders Fogh Rasmussen reached out to the People's Party, a nationalist party that had also made significant gains. The
new Conservative government introduced a series of measures affecting immigrants, ranging from cutting state benefits
to raising the threshold required to obtain Danish citizenship. Such measures, especially in the wake of 9-11, triggered an
intense public debate over the once taboo topics of immigration and integration.
While some politicians and commentators embraced an extreme tone, as when a People's Party spokesperson compared
Muslims to cancer cells, [1] much of the debate was constructive. For the first time, newspapers began to report crimes
committed by gangs of teenage immigrants and honor killings of young Danish Muslim women. Politicians detailed
overrepresentation of immigrants in benefit abuse and criminal activities. For example, in 2004, Danish authorities pressed
charges against five times as many second generation immigrants than against ethnic Danes. In Copenhagen, three in
four minors arrested are of immigrant background. [2]
Journalists also began to focus attention on the activities of some of Denmark's most radical imams. These clerics, for
their part, did not hesitate to supply the media with headline-making statements. In 2004, one Copenhagen imam, for
example, said in a televised interview that Danish women who do not wear the veil "were asking for rape;" other clerics
recommended that Denmark adopt the tribal concept of blood money. [3]
ENTER JYLLANDS-POSTEN
At the forefront of Denmark's new openness toward discussion of Muslim integration was Jyllands-Posten, the
country's largest circulation newspaper. Conservative, but respected for independent reporting, Jyllands-Posten,
in 2005, won the "To Multiplicity, against Discrimination" award from the European Union for its positive coverage of
successful cases of Muslim immigration in Denmark. [4] At the same time, though, the paper began to run a series of
stories on radical imams in the Aarhus area, with particular focus on two who had made Gellerup their headquarters.
The first to be the focus of Jyllands-Posten was Raed Hlayhel, a Lebanese graduate of the University of Medina
in Saudi Arabia, where he immersed himself in Wahhabism. [5] He moved to Denmark in 1999, after receiving a
humanitarian visa to get medical care for his son, but refused to learn Danish. Hlayhel established himself at Gellerup's
small Grimhoejvej mosque and began to preach his strict and politicized interpretation of Islam, attracting a small
following among the neighborhood's Arab population. His sermons repeatedly made Jyllands-Posten headlines,
as he decreed that Muslim women should cover themselves from head to toe and will disqualify themselves from
paradise, if they wear perfume or go to the hairdresser. [6]
Hlayhel teamed up with 28-year-old imam Ahmed Akkari. Born in Lebanon, Akkari had grown up in Aalborg and made
a name for himself when, at age 15, local papers portrayed him as a model immigrant and joined a campaign to prevent
his family's deportation to Lebanon for illegal immigration. [7] After winning his battle with the government, Akkari
attracted attention for other reasons. In 2001, a Danish court convicted Akkari of assault, after he almost ripped off the
ear of an 11-year-old boy who had accidentally removed Akkari's sister's veil; in another circumstance, he advocated
kicking unveiled Muslim girls. [8]
Both Hlayhel and Akkari had an axe to grind with the Danish press and with Jyllands-Posten in particular. They
saw an opportunity when Jyllands-Posten published twelve cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. [9]
Culture Editor Flemming Rose explained that the idea of running such cartoons came to him "in response to several
incidents of self-censorship in Europe caused by widening fears and feelings of intimidation in dealing with issues
related to Islam." [10] In the aftermath of the assassination of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, ritually butchered in
central Amsterdam by an Islamist who had been offended by van Gogh's movie Submission, Rose was
disturbed by several episodes in which European artists and publishers refused to display art or perform plays that
could expose them to similar threats. Having learned that a local author writing a book on Muhammad was having
problems finding illustrators, Rose contacted forty illustrators and asked them to draw cartoons on the subject,
curious to see what their responses would be. Only twelve cartoonists responded. Most of the cartoons were
harmless, but a few were offensive and two depicted the Prophet negatively: one drew him with a bomb-shaped turban
and another as an assassin.
Anger within the Danish Muslim community was high. Some Muslim readers sent letters to the newspaper denouncing
the cartoons and organized peaceful protests to express their frustration. For Hlayhel, this was not enough. He
admonished:
"Muslims will never accept this kind of humiliation. The article
has insulted every Muslim in the world. We demand an apology." [11]
Two days later, Hlayhel and Akkari contacted like-minded imams throughout the country and summoned them to Odense,
a city halfway between Aarhus and Copenhagen. [12] Addressing the clerics with a rhetoric insisting that "you are either
with me or against Islam," Hlayhel said he would fight to obtain an apology and perhaps other concessions, not only from
Jyllands-Posten, but also from the Danish government. [13]
Hlayhel's attitude was likely shaped not only by strong religious convictions, but also by personal ambition. He saw in the
crisis the opportunity to enhance his own prestige within the Danish Muslim community. [14] He could leapfrog from being
an imam at a small mosque in the suburbs of Denmark's second largest city to being the de facto leader of Danish Muslims.
Hlayhel's ultimatum put other imams in a dilemma: to play along and attract negative publicity or stand accused by a radical
upstart of being insufficiently willing to defend Islam.
ENTER ABU LABAN
Ahmed Abu Laban, a 60-year-old Palestinian from Jaffa, who had become perhaps Denmark's most famous imam, was a case
in point. A frequent commentator on Danish television and in meetings with government officials, he had taken pains to
label himself a moderate. But Abu Laban's past was marred by connections with terrorists. He had settled in Copenhagen in
1983, after being expelled from both Egypt and Kuwait for his involvement in the Muslim Brotherhood. [15] In Denmark, he
became the right-hand man of Abu Talal al-Qassimy, [16] a top leader of the Egyptian terrorist group Gama'a Islamiya who
had received asylum in Denmark after fighting in Afghanistan alongside Osama bin Laden and other future founders of
al-Qa'ida. Many other Gama'a members subsequently passed through Copenhagen, including al-Qa'ida's number two,
Ayman al-Zawahiri. [17] Abu Laban also worked as a translator and distributor of al-Murabitoun, the Gama'a's
official magazine, which was published out of Copenhagen and, at the time, glorified the killing of Western tourists in Egypt
and urged the annihilation of Jews in Israel. [18]
Abu Laban understood that leaving the spotlight to others could cost him his position of leadership within the Muslim
community. Despite mutual suspicions, Abu Laban and Hlayhel teamed up to create and lead the Committee for the Defense
of the Honor of the Prophet, which consisted of twenty-seven Muslim organizations and mosques whose stated aim was to
obtain an apology for the cartoons. The Committee was less than met the eye, however; Abu Laban invited to Odense only
imams known for their radical views. Many of the twenty-seven member organizations were either empty fronts or groups
with no more than ten members. [19]
A few days later, Hlayhel issued a press release demanding an apology from Jyllands-Posten on behalf of the entire
Muslim community. His call for an apology was a veiled threat. "We are not threatening anybody," said the Lebanese cleric,
"but when you see what happened in Holland and then still print the cartoons, that's quite stupid." [20] Abu Laban and the
other imams also contacted the media and voiced their indignation.
While the story was top news in Denmark, outside reaction was muted. On October 17, 2005, the Egyptian newspaper
al-Fajr published the cartoons to illustrate that the depictions were in poor taste, [21] as did the widely read
Indonesian news website Rakyat Merdeka. [22] Publication of the cartoons sparked not outrage, but only
indifference.
Many moderate Danish Muslims sought to distance themselves from the Committee's actions. On January 16, 2006,
Jyllands-Posten ran a front page story with the statements of forty-nine Danish Muslims who wanted to express
their disapproval of the actions of the imams and dispel the notion that the Committee spoke on behalf of the Muslim
community. [23]
For a few weeks, the radical imams continued to voice their protests, while Jyllands-Posten defended its right to
freedom of expression and satire. With their efforts going nowhere, the imams contacted the ambassadors to Denmark of
various Muslim countries to seek their assistance in convincing the Danish government to force Jyllands-Posten
to apologize. Eleven of the diplomats, led by Egypt's ambassador Mona Omar Attia, sought a meeting with Danish Prime
Minister Rasmussen to discuss the issue. Rasmussen refused. He explained:
"This is a matter of principle. I won't meet with them
because it is so crystal clear what principles Danish
democracy is built upon that there is no reason to do
so. As Prime Minister, I have no power whatsoever
to limit the press — nor do I want such a power." [24]
INTERNATIONALIZING THE CRISIS
In response, the imams decided to escalate matters. Abu Laban called upon his connections throughout the Muslim world
to "internationalize this issue so that the Danish government would realize that the cartoons were not only insulting to
Muslims in Denmark, but also to Muslims worldwide." [25]
Helped by the Muslim ambassadors, he put together two delegations of Danish Muslims who traveled to various Muslim
countries to solicit support. The delegations met with, among others, Arab League Secretary Amr Moussa, the Grand Imam
of Al-Azhar University, Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, and influential Sunni scholar, Yusuf al-Qaradawi. The
delegation showed each of these leaders the twelve cartoons published by Jyllands-Posten, along with others
which had never been published in any Danish publication. [26] The new cartoons were much more offensive than the
original twelve: one was falsely alleged to depict the Prophet Muhammad with a pig face and another to show him having
intercourse with a dog. When challenged with this fraud, the imams said that the new images had been sent to them via
e-mail as threats and had been shown to their Middle Eastern hosts only to give them an idea of the widespread
anti-Muslim sentiment in Denmark, a claim that cannot be verified. A booklet presented by the delegation contained
several blatant untruths about the oppression of Muslims in Denmark, claiming Muslims do not have the legal right to
build mosques and are subjected to pervasive racism. [27] Some of the imams also gave interviews to Arab media,
reiterating their accusations and claiming that the Danish government was planning to censor the Qur'an. [28]
The imams' tour was successful. By the end of December, 2005, the cartoon controversy had become international. Middle
Eastern regimes, trying to ride the wave of religious revival influencing their populations, rushed to condemn the cartoons
and called for boycotts of Danish goods. [29] The Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Arab League held
meetings on the matter. [30] The Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups used the controversy to prove their claim
that the West hates Islam. [31] Many groups and organizations, for different reasons, opportunistically jumped on the "I
hate Denmark" bandwagon.
News of the Danish controversy spread throughout the Muslim world. The same cartoons that had not sparked reaction in
October caused outrage three months later. At the end of January, 2006, and the beginning of February, 2006, the West
watched as the cartoon controversy peaked. In Denmark, a country where even top politicians normally go around on
bicycles, security guards were assigned to various Jyllands-Posten editors, and bomb threats were called in almost
daily to various newspapers. Danish websites were hacked, and Islamists posted on-line threats of attacks against the
country. [32]
Various clerics issued fatwas calling for the death of the twelve cartoonists, and a Pakistani cleric even put a US$1 million
bounty on their heads. [33] Several Muslim countries officially endorsed a boycott of Danish goods launched by religious
organizations. Protesters from Gaza to Jakarta burned Danish flags and effigies of Rasmussen. That many used the
controversy for local reasons was apparent. In Pakistan, where Islamists could not find buildings with Danish links, they
attacked U.S. fast food restaurants. [34] In Libya, rioters did not attack Danish facilities, but targeted the consulate of Italy,
the country's former colonial power. [35] In Yemen, government forces falsely accused opposition journalist and free press
advocate Hafez al-Bukari of accepting Danish money. [36] And in Afghanistan, the target was the U.S. Air Force base at
Bagram. [37]
ENTER NASER KHADER
Paradoxically, a year later, the consequences of the crisis have been largely positive for Denmark. There has been no terrorist
attack against either Denmark or Danish interests abroad. The boycott of Danish goods caused only minor losses for some
Danish companies, but did not affect the country's general economy. [38] In some cases, the boycott backfired: Egypt saw a
30 percent drop in Scandinavian tourism, and Danish papers reported that the Egyptian tourism attaché in Denmark was
flooded with phone calls and e-mails from Egyptian hotel owners begging him to bring back Danish tourists. [39] Danes also
proved the imams' accusations of Danish racism wrong; there was not a single anti-Muslim attack in Denmark throughout the
cartoon crisis.
The controversy catapulted the debate about Muslim integration into the top issue among all political parties in Denmark.
Seldom is there a day without a newspaper editorial, university roundtable, or a television program discussing Muslim
integration. Compared with the period before the crisis erupted, the debate is more sophisticated and nuanced. The Danes
understand that the Muslim community is not a monolithic bloc, but encompasses different religious traditions, ethnic
backgrounds, and political opinions. The crisis has taught the Danes to distinguish Muslims who believe their faith is
compatible with a secular constitutional democracy and seek integration within Danish society from those who promote
Shari‘a (Islamic law) and shun Danish society.
Rose wrote in an editorial stating that the country's radical imams have been marginalized and "no longer speak for the
Muslim community in Denmark, because moderate Muslims have had the courage to speak out against them." [40] Possibly
the most positive consequence of the cartoon controversy is the emergence of a number of moderate Muslim leaders, who
have confronted the imams and affirmed their pride in living in a society that gives them freedom of expression and religion.
The best known among this group is a young Syrian-born Danish parliamentarian, Naser Khader.
Khader moved to Copenhagen in 1974 at the age of 11, rejoining his father who had found a job there as an unskilled worker. [41]
Learning Danish, he received a Master's degree in Political Science in 1993 and launched a successful political career, first
locally and then nationally, making integration a priority issue. For more than a decade, Khader had criticized the attitude of
many Muslim immigrants who settle in Denmark without embracing its values. His 1996 book, Honor and Shame, [42]
which denounced some aspects of Middle Eastern culture as backwards, led to a violent confrontation with Abu Laban; the
two men have not spoken since. While Danish media had once characterized the dispute between Abu Laban and Khader as
merely a rift within the Muslim community, they now recognize its significance to and consequence for Danish society.
At the height of the cartoon controversy, Khader founded the Democratic Muslim Network, an organization aimed at uniting
moderate Danish Muslims. Membership in Khader's organization is dependent on endorsing a document called The Ten
Commandments of Democracy, [43] the first commandment of which is, "We must all separate politics and religion, and
we must never place religion above the laws of democracy." [44]
Abu Laban has described Khader and his Muslim supporters as "rats in a hole" and "cowards" responsible for the troubles
of all Muslims in Europe. [45] Then, in March, 2006, French journalist Mohammed Sifaoui used a hidden camera to tape
comments made by the Danish imams during what they thought was a break in an interview. [46] "If he becomes minister for
foreigners or integration," said Akkari, "wouldn't there be two guys sent over to blow up him and his ministry?" Because of
the ensuing outrage, Akkari wrote an open letter to Khader, apologizing for what he called his bad joke.
Still support could be higher. Many Muslims support Khader's vision, but are afraid to do so publicly. Several who have
endorsed Khader's views have received threats. Others fear labeling by the radical imams. "If you disagree with the imams
you are accused of defending Jyllands-Posten, of being against Islam," said Rabih Azad Ahmed, a Palestinian-born
Gellerup resident active in various intercultural initiatives. "Moderate Muslims are stuck in the middle." [48]
THE SECURITY SERVICES' DILEMMA
While Danes sympathize with the moderate Muslims, the government must still address the radicalism of a segment of the
community. No solution is without consequence. The Danish Security Intelligence Service (Politiets Efterretningstjeneste,
or PET), Denmark's domestic intelligence agency, knows well the goals of the radical imams, but may fear alienating them.
"I could have raised hell here in Denmark," said Abu Laban in the aftermath of the cartoon controversy, "I could have
made the Muslims lash out." [49] Concerned with the immediate goal of avoiding violence inside Denmark, PET still
engages with Abu Laban and other radical imams and sometimes praises them. In a controversial interview given in March,
2005, Hans Joergen Bonnichsen, the former PET head, accused the media of demonizing the imams whom he praised for
their role in calming down the Muslim community during the crisis. [50]
PET's policy of shortterm obsequiousness may have longterm repercussions. Radical imams use the authorities'
endorsement to boost their own status within the Muslim community, portraying themselves as the only ones who can
represent and defend it. At the same time, the imams manipulate the relationship, becoming necessary mediators in any
contact between authorities and the Muslim community. When, for example, in June, 2006, a small Rightwing group
organized a provocative anti-Muslim protest inside Gellerup, the police dispatched insufficient numbers and had to resort
to the imams' help to stop the local Muslim youth from attacking the protesters. If keeping order within the Muslim
community is subcontracted to the imams, the state relinquishes part of its authority on its own soil to the benefit of
megalomaniacal imams disloyal to Denmark and its constitutional democracy.
There are other reasons to be skeptical about the security services' benign attitude toward radical imams. Tina Magaard,
an expert in Islamic literature at the University of Aarhus, analyzed a sermon delivered by Hlayhel in the aftermath of the
cartoon saga, in which, according to his Manichean vision of the world, he divided Danish society into good and bad. [51]
If Jyllands-Posten, the Danish government, and the People's Party were evil for their roles in the cartoon
controversy, PET and Arla, the Aarhus-based food industry giant that condemned the cartoons fearing economic
repercussions against its businesses in the Middle East, are praised for solidarity with Muslims. Magaard believes that
Hlayhel considers his own position in Denmark to be similar to that of Muhammad in Medina when the Prophet, having
limited power at that stage, formed alliances with tribes of polytheists and Jews. PET and Arla, in Hlayhel's vision, are
good Danish "tribes" with whom a deal can be made for the greater good of Muslims. But Hlayhel's covenant, like
Muhammad's, Magaard warns, is revocable: it will be valid only as long as it serves the Muslims' interest, and
circumstances will change as the balance of power shifts. [52]
THE AFTERMATH
It seems that power may be the imams' goal. Since the cartoon saga ended, Hlayhel has thrown his weight behind the
construction of a large new mosque inside Gellerup, a project he had previously opposed. Wealthy Saudi businessmen
have visited his mosque, attracted by his new notoriety. Since money for the construction of the mosque now comes
from foreign sponsors supportive of his politics, [53] Hlayhel stands to benefit more and expand his influence at the
expense of those more beholden to the local community. On the other hand, those moderate and liberal Muslim
organizations that do not receive foreign largesse struggle to survive. Some receive funding from the City Council, but
often at the expense of accusations of being government puppets.
Like the cartoon controversy, the Danish solution to the dual dilemma of how to empower moderate Muslims without
tainting them and how to marginalize radicals without backlash will have repercussions beyond Denmark's border.
While some in Europe are watching, many others remain in a state of denial, handicapped by political correctness and
self-destructive taboos.
NOTES:
[1] Spiegel Online, Feb. 8, 2006.
[2] Author interviews with Danish member of parliament, Copenhagen, June 2006.
[3] The Copenhagen Post, Sept. 24, 2004; Berlingske Tidende (Copenhagen), June 3, 2005.
[4] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten (Aarhus), May 3, 2005.
[5] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, May 21, 2006.
[6] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, May 21, 2006.
[7] Ekstra Bladet (Copenhagen), Feb. 14, 2006.
[8] Ekstra Bladet, Feb. 15, 2006.
[9] Sept. 30, 2005.
[10] Flemming Rose, "Why I Published Those Cartoons," The Washington Post, Feb. 19, 2006.
[11] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Oct. 9, 2005.
[12] Author interviews with Gellerup Muslim leaders, June 2006.
[13] Author interviews with Gellerup Muslim leaders, June 2006.
[14] Author interviews with Gellerup Muslim leaders, June 2006.
[15] Author interview with Naser Khader, Copenhagen, June 2006.
[16] Analysis of the June 26, 1995 searches of the Viale Jenner mosque, Direzione per le Investigazioni Generali e per le Operazioni Speciali (DIGOS), Sept. 15, 1997.
[17] The Guardian (London), Sept. 24, 2001.
[18] Evan F. Kohlmann, Al-Qaida's Jihad in Europe: The Afghan-Bosnian Network (Oxford: Berg, 2004), pp. 26-7.
[19] Author interviews with Gellerup Muslim leaders, June 2006.
[20] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Oct. 9, 2005.
[21] "Muslim Cartoon Row Timeline," BBC News, Feb. 19, 2006.
[22] The Washington Post, Feb. 16, 2006.
[23] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Jan. 16, 2006.
[24] The Copenhagen Post, Oct. 25, 2005.
[25] IslamOnline, Nov. 18, 2005.
[26] The Washington Post, Feb. 16, 2006.
[27] Copy of the booklet is in the possession of the authors.
[28] See, for example, Ahmed Abu Laban, Al-Jazeera television (Doha) interview on DR1, Danish state television, Feb. 3, 2006.
[29] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Jan. 31, 2006; Al-Jazeera, Jan. 29, 2006; BBC News, Jan. 31, 2006.
[30] H.E Prof Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary general, Organization of Islamic Conference, press release, Jeddah, Jan. 28, 2006; BBC News, Jan. 31, 2006.
[31] Olivier Guitta, "The Cartoon Jihad," The Weekly Standard, Feb. 20, 2006; The Telegraph (London), Mar. 2, 2006.
[32] BBC News, Feb. 8, 2006.
[33] USA Today, Feb. 17, 2006.
[34] BBC News, Feb. 15, 2006.
[35] CNN.com, Feb. 18, 2006.
[36] Yemen Times (Sana'a), Sept. 26, 2005.
[37] USA Today, Feb. 6, 2006.
[38] Author interviews with Danish member of parliament, Copenhagen, June 2006.
[39] Politiken (Copenhagen), Mar. 9, 2006.
[40] Rose, "Why I Published Those Cartoons."
[41] Author interview with Naser Khader, Copenhagen, June 2006; information available at Khader's website, khader.dk, accessed Sept. 5, 2006.
[42] Ære og Skam (Copenhagen: Borgen,1996).
[43] Naser Khader, "The Ten Commandments of Democracy," khader.dk, accessed Sept. 5, 2006.
[44] Ibid.
[45] The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 13, 2006.
[46] TV-DR1, Danish National Broadcasting Corp., Mar. 25, 2006.
[47] Author interview with Naser Khader, Copenhagen, June 2006.
[48] Author interview with Rabih Azad Ahmed, Aarhus, June 2006.
[49] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, May 12, 2006.
[50] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Mar. 26, 2006.
[51] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, May 21, 2006.
[52] Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, May 21, 2006.
[53] Author interviews with Gellerup Muslim leaders, June 2006.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Civil Liberties -- Constitutional Rights to Free Speech & Free Press
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
International Politics & World Disorder:
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
Pernille Ammitzbøll is a journalist with Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten. Lorenzo Vidino is an analyst for the Investigative
Project on Terrorism and author of Al-Qaeda in Europe: The New Battleground of International Jihad (Prometheus, 2005).
The foregoing article by Pernille Ammitzboll and Lorenzo Vidino was originally published in the Middle East Quarterly,
Winter, 2007, and can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
January 2, 2007
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume IX, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity