GOP "FRONTRUNNERS" & THE DIXIE CHICKS
By Christopher G. Adamo
By far the biggest news coming out of the Grammys was the virtual “sweep” of those awards taken by the Dixie Chicks. Yet the event should come as no surprise, given the guiding philosophy of that segment of the recording industry.
Though not as widely understood as Hollywood’s “Oscars,” the inner circle of the recording business operates in a manner similar to the “Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.” Far from being the “vindication” of the group’s Leftist ideology, as claimed by Liberals within the industry, along with the Dixie Chicks themselves, the inordinate attention they received simply proves the existence of a similar mindset among the industry’s insiders.
America has grown weary and disgusted with incessant attempts by the Hollywood counterculture to remold the nation into its own image. Were their philosophies actually representative of the mainstream, movies such as “Brokeback Mountain,” the predictable tale of “romance” between two gay sheepherders, would indeed enjoy popularity commensurate with the enormous publicity it received.
Instead, Americans remain frustratingly loyal to the traditional depictions of courage, heroism and masculinity, which are genuinely reflective of America's traditional values and the nation's roots.
Similarly, the Dixie Chicks repertoire has all but gone extinct among the country music stations of the American heartland. And despite efforts by recording industry “elites” to tell America otherwise, this situation will assuredly remain unchanged by Sunday’s love fest.
Instead, those unenlightened country stations will go on playing the sort of time-honored flag-waving, America celebrating fare that real Americans have grown to love, and are not ready to abandon simply because Natalie Maines, Jane Fonda, or Barbara Streisand tell them they should.
Oddly, those with the greatest need to comprehend the significance of this episode are the current leadership of the Republican Party. For, although Liberals generally ascribe to a “herd mentality” (perhaps “mob mentality” would be the better descriptor) and therefore can be readily programmed and directed from above, their counterparts on the political and cultural Right -- i.e., the true Conservatives -- are unshakably committed to a set of guiding principles that transcend partisan politics and political ideology. And these Conservatives will remain immovable, despite the most fervent efforts of amoral and unprincipled opportunists -- socalled "pragmatists" and "realists" -- to persuade them otherwise. The principled Conservatives will not be moved by the Liberal Leftists and political opportunists, not even by those in the Republican Party, much less by those that comprise the vast majority in the Democratic Party.
As the 2008 election campaign season opens, Republicans are told that their best hope to succeed George Bush in 2008 must come from a field of only three candidates -- John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Guiliani. According to the “conventional wisdom” of GOP insiders, the Conservative base simply must rally to them, since only one of these three can possibly win the Republican primaries to be held early next year.
Yet, what is not being publicly admitted is that not any of three mentioned as potential Republican presidential candidates -- McCain, Romney, and Guiliani -- has any possible chance of winning in the general election.
Conservative America will neither accept a definition of its best interests that has been dictated by a wholly "pragmatic," unprincipled party elite, nor will it be stampeded into compliance merely out of an inordinate fear of Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama. Such an approach is guaranteed to bring in approximately forty percent of the vote and no more, which in turn translates into a guarantee of defeat.
Yet, aside from an actual victory in 2008, Liberal Republicans have another goal for their party. Rudy Guiliani in particular holds the best hope of GOP “moderates” to fulfill their pathetic dreams of expunging, once and for all, any vestiges of the despised “religious Right” from their midst. For in order to support the likes of Guiliani, Christian Traditionalists, Christian Conservatives, would be required to suspend (only temporarily of course), their heartfelt convictions regarding the defining moral issues of the times.
Nevertheless, from that day forward, the party leadership would know without any doubt that they need not ever take such “convictions” seriously again. In a pinch, they could always rely on the “religious right” to go for even the slight “lesser of two evils.” And henceforth, that is all they would ever offer.
With their consistent blindness, these “moderates” remain ignorant of the fact that, if expelled from the workings of the Republican Party, Christian Conservatives would take with them not only their views, but also their votes.
Of course, Conservative America is continually reminded of the significance of the terrorist threat that it faces, and of Guiliani’s likely competence in confronting that threat. But it is ludicrous to presume that America could possibly remain steadfast against the incursion of militant Islam from abroad if, within the nations borders, its moral and spiritual foundations crumble.
Despite election cycle platitudes meant to appease the the Republican Party's Rightwing base, Guiliani, and no less Romney or McCain, would seriously undermine that critical line of defense. Such societal degradation constitutes an enabling threat, ultimately greater than militant Islam itself.
The Conservative “grassroots” simply will not abandon its heartfelt concerns in order to mindlessly devote itself to the interests of the “elites” within the GOP. Republican Party leaders who believe they can force Conservatives to betray such core principles, all for the sake of a single election, are “whistling Dixie.”
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
Morality, Decency, & Traditional American Family Values
Religion, Secularism, & America
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, & Other Leftists
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
-------------------------
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Liberalism
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer who lives in southeastern Wyoming and works in the field of industrial instrumentation.
He is actively involved in Wyoming's political process, serving as a delegate to successive Wyoming State Republican Conventions
and as a member of the Wyoming State Republican Central Committee. He has assisted Republican candidates for local and state
legislatures and for the United States Congress. His articles, which appear regularly in The Progressive Conservative, U.S.A.,
and on a number of other websites, reflect a major concern with the damage being done to Conservatism and Conservative causes by
the Liberal Leftist faction in the Republican Party as well as by the much larger and more powerful Liberal Leftist faction in the
Democratic Party. During the early and middle 1990s, Adamo was Editor of the Wyoming Christian Coalition's official news organ,
The Wyoming Christian.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 *
American Government 3 *
American Government 4
American Government 5 *
American Politics *
Anglosphere *
Arabs
Arms Control & WMD *
Aztlan Separatists *
Big Government
Black Africa *
Bureaucracy *
Canada *
China *
Civil Liberties *
Communism
Congress, U.S. *
Conservative Groups *
Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law *
Counterterrorism *
Criminal Justice *
Disloyalty *
Economy
Education *
Elections, U.S. *
Eminent Domain *
Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World *
Ethnicity & Race *
Europe *
Europe: Jews
Family Values *
Far East *
Fiscal Policy, U.S. *
Foreign Aid, U.S. *
France
Hispanic Separatism *
Hispanic Treason *
Human Health *
Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. *
Intelligence, U.S. *
Iran *
Iraq *
Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat *
Islamism *
Israeli vs. Arabs *
Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism *
Jihad Manifesto I *
Jihad Manifesto II *
Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments *
Judiciary, American *
Latin America *
Latino Separatism
Latino Treason *
Lebanon *
Leftists/Liberals *
Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. *
Marriage & Family *
Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs *
Middle East: Iran *
Middle East: Iraq *
Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon *
Middle East: Syria *
Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey *
Militant Islam *
Military Defense *
Military Justice
Military Weaponry *
Modern Welfare State *
Morality & Decency
National Identity *
National Security *
Natural Resources *
News Media Bias
North Africa *
Patriot Act, USA *
Patriotism *
Political Culture *
Political Ideologies
Political Parties *
Political Philosophy *
Politics, American *
Presidency, U.S.
Private Property *
Property Rights *
Public Assistance *
Radical Islam
Religion & America *
Rogue States & WMD *
Russia *
Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason *
Senate, U.S. *
Social Welfare Policy *
South Africa
State Government, U.S. *
Subsaharan Africa *
Subversion *
Syria *
Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 *
Treason & Sedition *
Tunisia *
Turkey *
Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity *
UN & Its Agencies *
USA Patriot Act *
U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure *
U.S. Intelligence *
U.S. Senate *
War & Peace
Welfare Policy *
WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor