THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IX, Issue # 54, March 27, 2007
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
FORTY YEARS OF PEVERSE "SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY":
Environmental Crusades Against DDT & Fossil Fuels
Hurt the People & the Planet
By Paul K. Driessen
POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM VERSUS HUMAN HEALTH & ECONOMIC GROWTH: POLITICAL
ENVIRONMEMTALISTS, ANTI-INSECTICIDE PRESSURE GROUPS, & OPPOSITION TO THE USE OF DDT -- POLITICAL
ENVIRONMENTALISTS, GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS, & OPPOSITION TO ENERGY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --
USING SCIENTIFIC DATA TO DEMOLISH THE CENTRAL PREMISE OF GLOBAL WARMING THEORY -- GREENHOUSE GASES:
CAUSE & EFFECT
FULL STORY:
“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean,” said Humpty Dumpty – “neither more nor less.” Lewis
Carroll’s "Looking Glass" logic too often seems to be a guiding principle for environmental and corporate social
responsibility (CSR) activists.
They claim to be committed to people and planet, not just profits – and to honesty, transparency, accountability and
human health. One would expect that such basic ethical standards would apply equally to for-profit companies and
nonprofit advocacy corporations. However, the activists who defined CSR standards routinely exempt themselves
and use the terms primarily to pressure companies, raise money, and advance political agendas.
Forty years ago, Environmental Defense (ED) was launched to secure a ban on DDT and, in the words of co-founder
Charles Wurster, “achieve a level of authority” that environmentalists never had before. Its high-pressure campaign
persuaded EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus to ignore the findings of his own scientific panel and ban DDT in
the U.S.A. in 1972.
The panel had concluded that DDT is not harmful to people, birds, or the environment. That’s especially true when
small quantities are sprayed on walls to repel mosquitoes and prevent malaria. However, ED and allied groups
continued their misinformation campaign, until the chemical (and other insecticides) were banished even from most
global healthcare programs.
Thankfully, DDT had already helped eradicate malaria in the United States and Europe. But the disease still sickens
500 million people a year and kills 2 million, mostly African women and children. Since 1972, tens of millions have died
who might well have lived if their countries had been able to keep DDT in their disease control arsenals.
A year ago – after an extensive public education effort by the Congress of Racial Equality, Africa Fighting Malaria, the
Kill Malarial Mosquitoes NOW Coalition, and other health and human rights groups – the USAID and the World Health
Organization finally began supporting DDT use once again. But ED, Pesticide Action Network, and other agitators still
promote ridiculous anti-DDT themes on their websites, claiming it is “associated with” low birth weights in babies and
shortened lactation in nursing mothers.
Even if these assertions were true, notes Uganda’s Fiona Kobusingye, such risks “are nothing compared to the constant
danger of losing more babies and mothers to malaria.” She has had malaria at least 20 times and lost her son, two sisters,
and five nephews to the disease. “How can US environmentalists tell us we should be more worried about insecticides
than about malaria?” she asks. “Their attitudes are immoral eco-imperialism – a crime against humanity.”
None of these anti-insecticide pressure groups has ever apologized for their disingenuous campaigns or atoned in any
way for the misery and death they helped perpetuate – much less been held accountable. Instead, they blame today’s
horrendous malaria rates on global warming.
Malaria was once common even in Ohio, Virginia, California and Siberia – and they claim it is spreading because global
temperatures have risen a few tenths of a degree. Even worse, they are using fears of climate chaos to justify their long
antipathy to energy and economic development.
Two billion people rarely or never have electricity – for lights, refrigeration and cooking, water treatment plants, hospitals,
schools, offices, shops, and factories. Women and children are plagued with lung infections caused by wood and dung
fires, and by acute intestinal diseases caused by tainted water and spoiled food. Up to ten million die from these causes
every year.
But instead of helping destitute families get abundant, reliable, affordable electricity, Rainforest Action Network,
Environmental Defense, and other pressure groups block efforts to build coal and gas generating plants, because they
would release greenhouse gases. They block hydroelectric and nuclear projects on equally questionable grounds – and
then praise Citigroup, JP Morgan, and Bank of America for being “socially responsible,” by refusing to finance any major
power projects.
Up to 95% of people in Sub-Saharan countries have no electricity, Al Gore personally uses more electricity in a week than
25 million Ugandans do in a year – and agitators are telling Africans the biggest threat they face is hypothetical climate
change.
Environmental Defense is poised to rake in millions from emissions trading credits, through its new alliance with Morgan
Stanley, and an axis of anti-developers is telling the Third World: You can’t have electricity. You can’t have a modern,
industrialized society. Your future is expensive, intermittent, insufficient “renewable” energy: a solar panel on your hut, to
power a light bulb, radio, hot plate, and tiny refrigerator – and eventually a few wind turbines to electrify a school, a clinic,
and minimal light manufacturing operations.
Such a future would perpetuate poverty, deprivation, misery, and disease in Third World countries – ensuring death tolls
that would likely dwarf even the activists’ malaria records
In the United States, coal generates half of all electricity. Fossil fuels account for 80% of all the energy that fuels US
technology, progress, and living standards. Canada, Australia, and Europe also rely heavily on fossil fuels.
Proposals to reduce global carbon dioxide emissions by 80% over the next few decades would put U.S. companies at a
competitive disadvantage, cost millions of jobs, and add $2000-4000 to the average American family’s annual bill for
electricity, gasoline, food and other basics, say government and other studies. Other developed countries would suffer
similar fates.
Moreover, all this pain would bring no gain in the climate change arena. Ice core and temperature data covering thousands
of years clearly show that planetary temperatures rise first and, 400 to 800 years later, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels
increase. Temperatures fall and, centuries later, CO2 levels decline. Even Al Gore’s own temperature-and-CO2 graph
demonstrates this.
Warm oceans release trapped CO2, while colder seas absorb the gas, in cycles controlled by changes in solar energy and
cosmic ray output, shifts in the Earth’s orbit, and other natural forces. (See “The Great Global Warming Swindle” at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU)
Talk about an inconvenient truth!
It demolishes the central premise of climate alarmism – that CO2 is responsible for climate change. It makes it clear that the
Kyoto Protocol and assorted legislative proposals are nothing more than hundred-billion-dollar-a-year symbolic gestures,
whose primary effect would be to give bureaucrats and activists an ever greater “level of authority” over energy, economic,
and personal decisions.
To Humpty Dumpty, the central question when defining words was “who is to be master.” It’s become the central question
when discussing climate cataclysm theories.
Instead of CSR, we need global social responsibility: for all corporations, including multinational activist corporations; for all
people, especially the Third World’s poor and families on low and fixed incomes; and for all concerns, health and economic,
as well as environmental. A healthy dose of sound science and robust debate would be equally helpful.
© 2006 Paul K. Driessen
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Science, Ethics, & Human Health
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation,
the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is a featured
expert in "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, which
can be obtained at www.Eco-Imperialism.com. Email: pdriessen@cox.net
--- Telephone: (703) 698-6171
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume IX, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity