THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IX, Issue # 167, September 9, 2007
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
THE SORRY STATE OF SCIENCE REPORTING
By Alan Caruba
THE LACK OF CREDIBILITY OF SCIENCE REPORTING IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: THE SHREDDED FABRIC OF
MAINSTREAM REPORTING OF BREAKING SCIENCE NEWS, AS REGARDS THE CLAIMS OF PSEUDO-SCIENTISTS & POLITICAL
IDEOLOGUES THAT THE EARTH IS FACING IMMINENT CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE CHANGE, DUE TO A BUILD-UP OF CARBON
DIOXIDE & OTHER GREENHOUSE GASES IN THE ATMOSPHERE, A BUILD-UP CAUSED BY HUMAN ACTIVITY -- THE FLAWED
& FALSE "SCIENCE" OF HUMAN-INDUCED GLOBAL WARMING -- SLANTED & DISTORTED REPORTING TO MAKE THE "FACTS"
FIT IN WITH & SUPPORT GLOBAL WARMING THEORY -- DISHONEST "SCIENCE" REPORTERS WORKING IN LEAGUE WITH
POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS & GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS
FULL STORY:
New technology drives out old technology. As often as not, its impact is not known until many years after its introduction.
Meanwhile, we live our lives day to day.
This is what is happening to the business of publishing newspapers and magazines, places where, traditionally, writers
have earned a living. In an article in the Summer edition of the newsletter of The National Association of Science Writers,
the headline read: “Reporting withers while information explodes.” The author, Stuart F. Brown, like easily 85% or more of
the NASW membership, myself included, is a freelance writer.
“As the number of readers who turn to the Internet for their news has boomed, the business equation in publishing has
pretty much collapsed,” said Brown. “So we find ourselves in the curious situation of living in a society that increasingly
runs on technology and information — while witnessing the withering of the original reporting that tells us what’s going
on.”
It’s worse than a “curious situation.” A society dependent on technology and science really needs to understand it in
some fashion and most Americans haven’t a clue. This leaves them vulnerable to a lot of bad science, or “junk” science,
news. In the past, there were fulltime science writers on the staffs of the nation’s newspapers who made the phone calls,
did the interviews, collected the data, and explained it to us.
In the same issue of the NASW newsletter, Charles Petit, a former NASW president, wrote: “The Science Beat: Uh Oh,
Another One Bites the Dust.” After a 35-year career on the science beat for various media, Petit took a buyout from
U.S. News & World Report in 2004, when it scrapped its science unit, but retained health and medicine writers.
“Full-time, traditional-media science reporters covering breaking news are growing scarcer.”
Among those traditional media retaining science reporters, Petit cited Reuters, the international newswire. That
caught my eye because, along with the Associated Press, both of these dominant news services have served up a
full plate of skewed science reporting. This has been particularly true in the way “global warming” has been reported.
Writing for the American Thinker.com on August 10, 2007, James Lewis provided an article, “Twisting Science to
Fit the Global Warming Template,” in which he meticulously dissected the way a Reuters story reversed the actual
message of an article in Science magazine that “contained devastating information of flaws in the doomsters
methodology and warned that the disaster (global warming) had been postponed.” Lewis noted: “the Science
article itself is an artful retreat from previous, over-confident global warming predictions.” The article noted that “natural
variations” in the planet’s climate have been ignored for decades by the model-makers.
The public is only now beginning to understand that virtually all of the computer models used by the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other sources for predictions about global warming have been seriously
in error, often by deliberate design and intention. Some of the models ignored the mini-Ice Age of 1300 to 1800. Others
declared 1998 as the hottest year of the last century, when it was actually 1934, during a time famed for its droughts and
dustbowls.
Joining in this massive hoax have been the broad contingent of mainstream media that has breathlessly reported that
virtually every natural climate event has been the result of global warming and that we are all doomed.
The most recent and egregious example was Newsweek magazine, which attacked what it called global warming
“deniers” in a cover story replete with errors. It was so bad that, a week later, one of Newsweek's own editors,
Robert J. Samuelson, took the magazine to task for claiming that a “well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by contrarian
scientists, free-market think tanks, and industry has created a paralyzing fog of doubt around climate change.” Samuelson
called it “a peripheral and highly contrived story.”
Petit says that “the fabric of mainstream reporting of breaking science news is frayed, not shredded.”
From my point of view, however, after a steady diet of socalled science news telling us that everything we eat, drink and
breath is going to kill us and, if that doesn’t do it, the melting of the North and South Poles, the rise of oceans, the spread
of deserts and the death of just about every known species of animal will bring about human extinction, the credibility of
science reporting in the mainstream media has suffered some serious body blows.
For our skepticism, those of us who have disputed the endless lies about global warming have been labeled “deniers” in
much the same way as those who dispute the Holocaust. This is not by accident. The use of the word “deniers” has
opened the door for Robert Kennedy, Jr., to accuse us of being “traitors” and for the Weather Channel’s ordained
expert on global warming to suggest that any meteorologist who disagrees should have their certification taken away.
This is the stuff of despotism.
“What most people don’t know is that real science is a giant debating society, filled with skeptics,” says Lewis.
“It is only mature science that is stable and agreed-upon.
But mature science comes only after centuries of
cumulative evidence, and constant, heated debate.”
Declaring that a “consensus” exists among all the scientists of the world that global warming is occurring is a lie. Twisting
the results of a Science magazine report to reflect the opposite of its findings is a lie. Producing a “documentary”
called “An Inconvenient Truth” filled with distortions and lies deserves censure, not mandatory showings in all the
schools of the nation.
The U.S. national government has spent billions to determine if global warming exists. So far, it has not found any credible
evidence for this dubious theory. Worse yet, is the writing of laws in Congress that are based on this flawed and false
“science of global warming” that will drive up the cost of everything on which our economy depends. That is a criminal
misuse of the powers allocated to elected representatives.
As for the “science” you read about in the mainstream media these days, the rule of thumb is caveat emptor, buyer beware.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
The Earth's Natural History, Global Climate Changes,
& the Future of Human Life & Civilization on the Planet:
Science, Ideology, & Public Policy
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
The News Media & Political Bias
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a
clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted
on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at
www.anxietycenter.com.
Caruba’s new book, Right Answers: Separating Fact from Fantasy, has been published by Merril Press.
© Alan Caruba 2007
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume IX, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity