THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 141, June 30, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
THE PARTY-SLATE SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS:
THE WRONG ELECTORAL SYSTEM FOR IRAQ
By Michael Rubin
FULL STORY:
On June 30, 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Iraq will cease to exist. A caretaker Iraqi government will run the country
until elections in January, 2005. While the transfer of sovereignty is a watershed, Iraqis say true legitimacy will come only with the
elections.
But now technocratic decisions having to do with these elections are threatening to undercut the durability of any constitutional
democracy in the country. There are two ways to hold direct elections: by party slates, with each political party gaining representation
according to its portion of the nationwide vote, or by single-member constituencies, somewhat like our own congressional districts. On
June 4, Carina Perelli, head of the U.N. electoral advisory team in Iraq, endorsed party slates.
When I was a roving CPA political adviser, I lived outside the Green Zone and interacted not only with Iraqi politicians but also with
ordinary people. Voting was the topic of conversations at teahouses and mosques. Islamist parties tended to favor a party-slate system.
Advocates of an Iranian-style Islamic republic were blunt: "The first article in a democracy is the rule of the majority over the minority,"
Sayyid Hadi Modarresi, one of Karbala's most influential clerics, told the Arabic daily Al-Hayah.
Liberal -- i.e., constitutionalist as well as democratic -- Iraqis favor constituency-based elections. The Transitional Administrative Law
calls for a 275-member National Assembly, which translates into each district's member representing approximately 87,000 people.
Contests would occur not between parties but between individuals, who would be accountable to local residents, rather than to party
bosses. Former Governing Council members condemned as irrelevant by CPA administrator L. Paul Bremer could win some districts.
Raja Khuzai, an outspoken Shiite advocate for women's rights, is popular in her home town of Diwaniyah. Residents of Khadimiya
favor Iraqi National Congress head Ahmed Chalabi. A religious party leader, Abdul Aziz Hakim, is popular in Najaf. Less successful
would be uncharismatic, corrupt or abusive party hacks who hope to win power on the coattails of party bosses.
Older Iraqis also favor single-member constituencies. Distrust of political parties is deeply rooted. One recent poll indicated that
political parties have only a 3 percent favorability rating. Pensioners remember the 1960s as a time of pitched street battles between
adherents of Leftist and Nationalist parties. Younger generations view parties through the lens of the Baath Party experience, in which
employment depended on a party membership card. Distrust of parties extends to Iraqi Kurdistan, where I taught in the 2000-01
academic year. With few exceptions, my students associated local Kurdish parties with corruption, abuse of power, and nepotism.
Even Perelli, the U.N. official, acknowledged Iraqi ill feeling toward political parties. "The anti-political party feeling of the population
is extremely high," she told journalists in May, 2004. But at her news conference this month, Perelli explained her rationale for
abandoning the accountability of single-member constituencies in favor of pursuing party-slate elections. "There are a lot of
communities that have been broken and dispersed around Iraq," she said, "and these communities wanted to be able to accumulate
their votes and to vote with like-minded people."
With that one sentence, Perelli would set Iraq on the slippery slope to the failed Lebanese-style communal system. According to an
Iraqi electoral commission member, Paul Bremer agreed to a party-slate system to bypass the tricky question of who votes where, thereby
trading Iraq's long-term health for short-term expediency.
The U.N. endorsement of a party-slate system fails to correct the mistakes of the past year. While Bremer condemned the Governing
Council as irrelevant, the truth was more nuanced. Many Iraqis adopt the same "throw-the-bums-out" mentality that Americans voice
about Congress, even while supporting their own representatives. Distrust of the Governing Council was more pronounced in towns
such as Kut, which had no representation, than in cities, such as Najaf, which were represented. Even in Iraq, politics is about
patronage.
The party-slate system will not bolster representation. Many Iraqis share ethnicity, but not local interests. Tel Afar, a town of 160,000
east of Mosul, is 95 percent Shiite Turkmen. Its Turkish-speaking residents have little in common with Turkmen in Erbil or Kirkuk. The
party-slate system might also undercut religious freedom. Christians, for example, represent less than 3 percent of Iraq's population.
They remain concentrated in towns such as Alqosh, Ainkawa, and Duhok. Many Christians do not support parties such as the
Assyrian Democratic Movement. Without district-based elections, they may find themselves without representation. Smaller religious
communities that do not have their own political parties, but who live in clustered districts may find themselves without political
representation in the very important constitutional democratic process.
Four years ago, my University of Baghdad-trained translators repeatedly stumbled over words such as tolerance and compromise,
concepts that simply did not exist in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Now, with the decision to transfer responsibility for Iraq to an
international body concerned more with technical convenience than with constitutional representative democracy, the White House
threatens the future stability of Iraq. A one-person, one-vote, one-time election based on communal identity may please men like Hadi
Modarresi, but Iraqi constitutional democrats will view it as a betrayal of their future.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The American Political System: Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
Politics & Government: The Essentials
Constitutional Democracy & Other Political Regimes
British & American Constitutional Democracy
The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq
Page Two
Page One
The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History
The Middle East & the Arabs
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and Editor of the Middle East Quarterly. The
foregoing article by Rubin was originally published in the Washington Post (June 19, 2004) and also appears on the
Website maintained by the Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
June 23, 2004
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy