THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 253, November 21, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
WHO'S AFRAID OF OSAMA BIN LADEN?
By Alan Caruba
AL-QA'IDA & ISLAMISM: THE INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIST TERRORIST MOVEMENT & THE GLOBAL WAR IT IS WAGING
AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION & THE MODERN WORLD -- THE INCREASINGLY SHAKY GROUND ON WHICH THE ISLAMISTS
OPERATE & THE FORESEEABLE END OF THEIR MOVEMENT -- WHAT THE WORLD NEEDS TO DO: GET ON WITH THE JOB OF
ELIMINATING AL-QA'IDA, DESTROYING ITS HEAD, STEM, & ROOTS
FULL STORY:
In February, 1998, Osama bin Laden issued his second “fatwa” against the United States of America, stating: “The ruling to kill the
Americans and their allies — civilians and military — is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which
it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the Al-Aqsa mosque and the holy mosque (Mecca) from their grip.”
It’s not as if everyone from the President on down to a school child doesn’t know what bin Laden’s objectives are (or were). It’s not
as if, every few days in Iraq, and every few weeks elsewhere in the world, from London to Bali, Madrid to Amman, al-Qa'ida — a
relatively small handful of terrorists — does not demonstrate that its bloodlust has no bounds, killing Muslim and “unbeliever” alike
in a relentless attack on the modern world.
Therein lies the foreseeable end of al-Qa'ida and the global Islamo-Fascist movement. The bombings in Jordan, aimed specifically at
Arab Muslims, has put the lie to the claims of Osama bin Laden and his followers that the enemy is the United States, Israel, or
Western culture. Now, finally, Muslims in the Middle East and elsewhere can see that al-Qa'ida’s objective is the political takeover
of nations in the region. Driven out of Afghanistan, fearful of democracy in Iraq, al-Qa'ida is increasingly on shaky ground.
It hardly matters anymore whether Osama bin Laden is alive or dead. He is, like the face of Ernesto “Che” Guevara on a t-shirt, an
image of a romanticized despotism.
The problem for al-Qa'ida is that time and technology has passed them by. Theirs is an argument about who determines the rules of
the modern world, and the West has been winning that one now for a very long time. China knows it. India knows it. And, slowly, the
process of globalization, the expansion of trade and prosperity worldwide, leaves no room for the cave dwellers of al-Qa'ida.
I estimate that al-Qa'ida, as a terrorist movement, will run out of steam in about ten years. It is already beginning to lose support in its
home base of the Middle East, as Jordanians went into the streets to denounce it and Iraqis understand its threat to their future.
What began as a feud between bin Laden and the Saudi royal family has evolved into global effort whose perpetrators grow fewer
and whose funding is being shut off. The West, after a very slow start, is mobilizing to crush the movement.
Writing in his book, The West’s Last Chance, Tony Blankley says:
“Most experts believe that bin Laden’s peculiar predilection for seeking
ever more dramatic and symbolic acts of terrorism is the reason such
conventional attacks have not yet occurred in the United States. Thus,
so the theory goes, he won’t strike America again until he can be more
destructive than he was on September 11, 2001. When he leaves the
scene, or if some other Jihadist feels the call, we will be almost
completely open to random acts of violence by bomb or gunfire.”
Not a very good choice. However, it may not be quite that drastic. First of all, we have a pretty good law enforcement system, from the
FBI to the local sheriff’s office. Worldwide, the intelligence and law enforcement agencies are beginning to link together for common
goals. Then there’s our vast intelligence gathering capability. At some point, it’s going to get better at infiltrating the Islamo-Fascist
movement, more rapidly translating its communications, and ultimately eliminating its major players.
As Thomas P.M. Barnett notes in Blueprint for Action, a book you must read to understand major global trends, “We don’t
really fight regimes anymore, and we can’t find armies willing to take on the might of our Leviathan force.” Instead, in the
post-Vietnam era, we have sent our troops to arrest Panama’s Manuel Noriega; we went looking for Mohamed Farrah Aidid in Somalia;
we decapitated the gang headed by Slobadan Milosevic in the former Yugoslavia; and in Iraq, we dragged Saddam Hussein out of his
rat-hole, after killing his two equally vile sons-and-heirs.
Are we describing nations here? We are describing individuals. We are describing nations run by thugs. After we rid those nations of
these people, the big and essential job is to enable such nations to join the rest of the world as a reasonably democratic, economically
viable part of the whole. That’s the job of civil affairs military specialists and others. It takes time.
The primary error of those urging a quick withdrawal from Iraq is their failure to stay the course long enough to permit Iraq to reach a
point where they do not need a coalition force to protect it and maintain its internal and external security. When that day arrives, they
will tell us to leave. And we will.
So, where’s Osama? My best guess is that he is in Iran. My second guess is that he’s dead.
Consider how the nations of the world are adapting to the threat al-Qa'ida represents. The riots in France have served as a wake-up
call. Look to France to crack down. England is already in the process of doing so. European nations are going to be less tolerant and
less welcoming to Muslim immigrants who willfully refuse to assimilate.
In the Pacific Basin, Australia has said, in effect, “our way or the doorway” to local Muslims who demand sharia law. For Indonesia,
terrorism is bad for tourism and business. That’s, as they say, the bottom-line worldwide.
The question of whether bin Laden is alive or dead has become irrelevant. The world needs only to get on with the job of destroying
al-Qa'ida, putting an end to its head, stem, and roots.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq
Page Two
Page One
The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History
The Middle East & the Problem of Iran
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a
clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted
on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at
www.anxietycenter.com.
© Alan Caruba 2005
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues