THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 274, December 14, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
IRAQI BEACON
By Michael Rubin
THE IRAQI MARCH TOWARD CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY: DEMONSTRATION OF THE WISDOM OF THE U.S.A. &
ITS COALITION ALLIES STAYING THE COURSE IN IRAQ -- IRAQI VOTERS PARTICIPATING IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS HOLD
THEIR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR ITS ACTIONS & POLICIES
FULL STORY:
Tomorrow, Iraqis will go to the polls for the third time this year. Their actions mark both a triumph for the Iraqi people and a
warning for Arab autocrats. Not only has the Iraqi march toward constitutional democracy proved naysayers wrong, but
Iraqis' growing embrace of constitutional democracy demonstrates the wisdom of staying the course. Iraqis are changing
their political culture. Howard Dean and John Murtha may believe that the U.S. military has lost. Brent Scowcroft may think
Arab democracy a pipe dream. They are mistaken.
The greatest impediment to progress in the Arab world is not terrorism or Islamism; both are recent phenomena. Rather, it is
lack of accountability. Instead of accepting responsibility for lack of progress, many Arab regimes blame outsiders. In 2002,
the UN's Arab Development Report found that the Arab region has the lowest value of all regions of the world for "voice and
accountability." In his seminal article, "Why Arabs Lose Wars," Colonel Norvell De Atkine, an observer of Arab military
training, found that "taking responsibility . . . rarely occurs." Arab soldiers seldom admit, let alone learn from, mistakes. In
recent discussions with U.S. diplomats and military officials, Iraqi insurgents and former regime elements say that order can
be restored only with the empowerment of the former officer corps. They speak of the army's glories but, under Saddam
Hussein, triumphs were limited to parades and posturing.
Western scholars have long idealized Iraq's -- and even the Baath Party's -- past. Some suggest that, at least under Saddam's
early leadership, Iraq was a paragon of affluence and stability. In The Future of Iraq, for example, British scholars Liam
Anderson and Gareth Stansfield write that "Regardless of the oppressive (or 'evil') nature of the regime . . . in the economic
and social sphere, its achievements were truly impressive." They are not alone, but rather project a common myth. The reality
is quite different: Saddam's rule was marked by uninterrupted decline. According to Patrick Clawson, the International
Monetary Fund's desk officer for Iraq at the time, Iraq's standard of living declined to about one-quarter of its peak from the
time Saddam took power. In the same period, Iraq went from being among the least corrupt Arab states to among the most. It
is important to recognize the truth, especially as the resolve of our politicians wavers. There should be no whitewashing of
history.
Excuses can be made to absolve Saddam of responsibility. Multiple wars and sanctions contributed to the decline, but the
failure to recover was the result of mismanagement and misallocation. The cavernous marble palace, confiscated by Coalition
forces to serve as the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, was built almost entirely under sanctions. Oil for Food money disappeared
into foreign accounts. Saddam did not take responsibility for his failings: Iraq's travails were not his fault, but rather the result
of internal disloyalty or outside plots. Tens of thousands ended up in mass graves so that the leader could save face. Margins
of election victory hovering near 99% completed the illusion. Rather than defend the Iraqi people, Western peace activists
amplified the dictator's rhetoric. The Baath Party should be held responsible for its record. And today it is. Saddam sits behind
bars. De-Baathification remains popular among many Iraqis, even as they debate the nuance of its implementation.
The Coalition's ouster of Saddam may have created a template for change, but it is Iraqis who have pressed forward to hold
not only Saddam, but also subsequent politicians, to account. On June 28, 2004, Coalition Provisional Authority administrator
L. Paul Bremer appointed Iyad Allawi as Interim Prime Minister. Mr. Allawi, a former Baathist, was a favorite of the U.S., British,
and Jordanian intelligence services. He projected an image of strong leadership to an Iraqi audience craving security. He
promised to jumpstart reconstruction. But he failed. Corruption exploded. Iraqis blamed his empowerment of senior Baathists
for the spread of insurgency and decline in security. Furthermore, he treated U.S. diplomats, not Iraqis, as his most important
constituency. He campaigned surrounded by American security agents. Iraqis had enough. On January 30, 2005, millions
braved bombs to bounce him from office. Even with the trappings of incumbency -- media coverage and a bully pulpit for his
campaign -- he barely mustered 14%. As Egyptians, Libyans, Tunisians, and Syrians watched with envy, Iraqis held a failed
incumbent to account.
They will do it again tomorrow. Like Mr. Allawi, current Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari has failed. Local humor is telling. A
popular Baghdad joke tells of how he walks into his office to find a rooster, dog, and donkey. "I'm here to wake you up so
you can do your job," the rooster crows. "I'm here to provide security," the dog barks. "Why are you here?" Jaafari asks the
donkey. "I don't know. I'm no different from you," the donkey brays.
Under Saddam, and in other Arab autocracies, such jokes were dangerous. But in the new Iraq, the public translates its mood
into action. Mr. Jaafari may try to blame his failings on others, but hundreds of newspapers, and a proliferating network of
radio stations and TV networks, will not allow him. Ash-Sharqiya has won wide audiences with its political satire. Iraqi
editorial cartoonists are merciless. Those surrounding Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani may give a lukewarm endorsement to the
United Iraqi Alliance religious slate, but the clerical leadership realizes that they cannot push too hard. Iraqis may respect
religion, but they are not willing to forgive militia abuse, even in the name of religion. The Shiite slate may still win a plurality,
but its returns will decline. So, too, will that of the Kurdish list, as disgust with Masud Barzani's conflation of business and
politics is escalating.
Even some insurgents have come to realize the power of constitutional democracy. I traveled to Jordan last month to meet a
senior insurgent leader and unrepentant Baathist. He conceded that "resistance" activities had hurt too many Iraqis and
turned many in the hotbed Sunni province of al-Anbar against them. Sunni Arab groups that last year placed their hope for
empowerment on U.S. or Arab League intercession recognize that their best hope for empowerment is through the ballot box,
not boycotts and bombs.
The process of democratization may be messy, but it is working. Iraqis are frustrated with their situation, but, unlike elsewhere
in the Arab world, they can now hold their government to account. In Brent Scowcroft's world of realpolitik, Arab regimes are
unaccountable to their people. There are no constituents. Hatred festers, and autocrats blame outsiders. Instability and, in the
case of the Arab world, a half century of intermittent warfare results. In the face of stagnant government and corruption,
Tunisians, Egyptians, and Palestinians have turned toward Islamic radicals who seek to restrict freedom and promote terror.
But Iraqis have an alternative. Their vote has meaning. Arab regimes expect citizens to serve the ruler. But in Iraq, voters insist
that politicians serve the people.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq
Page Two
Page One
The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History
National Strategy for Victory in Iraq
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
Michael Rubin, Editor of the Middle East Quarterly, is an American Enterprise Institute scholar.
The foregoing article by Michael Rubin was originally published in the Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2005. and can
be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
December 14, 2005
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues